Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657383›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Artificial-cell-type aware cell-type classification in CITE-seq.

Qiuyu Lian, Hongyi Xin, Jianzhu Ma, Liza Konnikova, Wei Chen, Jin Gu, Kong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamic Synthesis of Multi-Modal Representations for CITE-seq Data Integration and Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. tagtango: an application to compare single-cell annotations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiuyu LianMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, BNRIST Bioinformatics Division, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Hongyi XinDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.
Jianzhu MaDepartment of Biochemistry and Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IA 47907, USA.
Liza KonnikovaDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.
Wei ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.
Jin GuMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, BNRIST Bioinformatics Division, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Kong ChenDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Epigenetic regulation of chemokines in lung inflammationR01HL137709 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHEN, KONG · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationCellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq), couples the measurement of surface marker proteins with simultaneous sequencing of mRNA at single cell level, which brings accurate cell surface phenotyping to single-cell transcriptomics. Unfortunately, multiplets in CITE-seq datasets create artificial cell types (ACT) and complicate the automation of cell surface phenotyping.

resultsWe propose CITE-sort, an artificial-cell-type aware surface marker clustering method for CITE-seq. CITE-sort is aware of and is robust to multiplet-induced ACT. We benchmarked CITE-sort with real and simulated CITE-seq datasets and compared CITE-sort against canonical clustering methods. We show that CITE-sort produces the best clustering performance across the board. CITE-sort not only accurately identifies real biological cell types (BCT) but also consistently and reliably separates multiplet-induced artificial-cell-type droplet clusters from real BCT droplet clusters. In addition, CITE-sort organizes its clustering process with a binary tree, which facilitates easy interpretation and verification of its clustering result and simplifies cell-type annotation with domain knowledge in CITE-seq. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://github.com/QiuyuLian/CITE-sort. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data is available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisCluster AnalysisEpitopesSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID32657383
PMCPMC7355304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.