Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657358›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

PhISCS-BnB: a fast branch and bound algorithm for the perfect tumor phylogeny reconstruction problem.

Erfan Sadeqi Azer, Farid Rashidi Mehrabadi, Salem Malikić, Xuan Cindy Li, Osnat Bartok, Kevin Litchfield, Ronen Levy, Yardena Samuels, Alejandro A Schäffer, E Michael Gertz and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Studying the History of Tumor Evolution from Single-Cell Sequencing Data by Exploring the Space of Binary Matrices.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Interrogation of clonal tracking data usingNature computational science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Erfan Sadeqi AzerDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.
Farid Rashidi MehrabadiDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.
Salem MalikićDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.
Xuan Cindy LiCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Osnat BartokDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Kevin LitchfieldCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Ronen LevyDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Yardena SamuelsDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Alejandro A SchäfferCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
E Michael GertzCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Chi-Ping DayLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Eva Pérez-GuijarroLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Kerrie MarieLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Maxwell P LeeLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Glenn MerlinoLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Funda ErgunDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.
S Cenk SahinalpCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

Preclinical Mouse Models for Studying Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ResponseZIABC011167 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MERLINO, GLENN T. · 2009 to 2024
$12.4M
Integrated analyses of genetics, epigenetics, and gene expressionZIHBC011703 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LEE, MAXWELL · 2016 to 2025
$10.9M
Tumor evolution and intratumor heterogeneityZIABC011987 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SAHINALP, SULEYMAN · 2020 to 2025
$6.6M
Medical Research Council MR/P014712/1Medical Research Council MR/P014712/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRecent advances in single-cell sequencing (SCS) offer an unprecedented insight into tumor emergence and evolution. Principled approaches to tumor phylogeny reconstruction via SCS data are typically based on general computational methods for solving an integer linear program, or a constraint satisfaction program, which, although guaranteeing convergence to the most likely solution, are very slow. Others based on Monte Carlo Markov Chain or alternative heuristics not only offer no such guarantee, but also are not faster in practice. As a result, novel methods that can scale up to handle the size and noise characteristics of emerging SCS data are highly desirable to fully utilize this technology.

resultsWe introduce PhISCS-BnB (phylogeny inference using SCS via branch and bound), a branch and bound algorithm to compute the most likely perfect phylogeny on an input genotype matrix extracted from an SCS dataset. PhISCS-BnB not only offers an optimality guarantee, but is also 10-100 times faster than the best available methods on simulated tumor SCS data. We also applied PhISCS-BnB on a recently published large melanoma dataset derived from the sublineages of a cell line involving 20 clones with 2367 mutations, which returned the optimal tumor phylogeny in <4 h. The resulting phylogeny agrees with and extends the published results by providing a more detailed picture on the clonal evolution of the tumor. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/algo-cancer/PhISCS-BnB. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeoplasmsHumansMarkov ChainsPhylogenySequence AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID32657358
PMCPMC7355310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.