Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657326›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2020

Structure-based enzyme engineering improves donor-substrate recognition of Arabidopsis thaliana glycosyltransferases.

Aishat Akere, Serena H Chen, Xiaohan Liu, Yanger Chen, Sarath Chandra Dantu, Alessandro Pandini, Debsindhu Bhowmik, Shozeb Haider

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Glycosylated cannabinoids inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deciphering the Coevolutionary Dynamics of L2 β-Lactamases via Deep Learning.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The sugar donor specificity of plant family 1 glycosyltransferases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rethinking Biosynthesis of Aclacinomycin A.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterization of 5-Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aishat AkerePharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, UCL School of Pharmacy, London WC1N 1AX, U.K.
Serena H ChenComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, U.S.A.
Xiaohan LiuPharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, UCL School of Pharmacy, London WC1N 1AX, U.K.
Yanger ChenCollege of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, China.
Sarath Chandra DantuDepartment of Computer Science, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, U.K.
Alessandro PandiniDepartment of Computer Science, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, U.K.
Debsindhu BhowmikComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, U.S.A.
Shozeb HaiderPharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, UCL School of Pharmacy, London WC1N 1AX, U.K.
Royal Pharmaceutical Society · GBBrunel University of London · GBOak Ridge National Laboratory · USSichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycosylation of secondary metabolites involves plant UDP-dependent glycosyltransferases (UGTs). UGTs have shown promise as catalysts in the synthesis of glycosides for medical treatment. However, limited understanding at the molecular level due to insufficient biochemical and structural information has hindered potential applications of most of these UGTs. In the absence of experimental crystal structures, we employed advanced molecular modeling and simulations in conjunction with biochemical characterization to design a workflow to study five Group H Arabidopsis thaliana (76E1, 76E2, 76E4, 76E5, 76D1) UGTs. Based on our rational structural manipulation and analysis, we identified key amino acids (P129 in 76D1; D374 in 76E2; K275 in 76E4), which when mutated improved donor substrate recognition than wildtype UGTs. Molecular dynamics simulations and deep learning analysis identified structural differences, which drive substrate preferences. The design of these UGTs with broader substrate specificity may play important role in biotechnological and industrial applications. These findings can also serve as basis to study other plant UGTs and thereby advancing UGT enzyme engineering.

Indexed as

Arabidopsis ProteinsDeep LearningGlucosyltransferasesGlycosyltransferasesModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein EngineeringRecombinant ProteinsStructural Homology, ProteinStructure-Activity RelationshipSubstrate SpecificityArabidopsis ProteinsGlucosyltransferasesGlycosyltransferasesRecombinant Proteinsdeep learningglycosyltransferasesmass spectrometrymolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID32657326
PMCPMC7419078
OpenAlexW3043679245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.