Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657029›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2020

Raltitrexed versus 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open labeled, randomized, controlled, and multicenter clinical trial.

Pengwei Yan, Haitao Yin, Wenjie Guo, Xiangdong Sun, Feng Li, Shengfu Huang, Xiuhua Bian, Feijiang Wang, Fuzheng Zhang, Buhai Wang and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Programmed cell death, redox imbalance, and cancer therapeutics.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Pengwei YanDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Haitao YinDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xuzhou Center Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Wenjie GuoDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiangdong SunDepartment of Radiotherapy, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shengfu HuangDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiuhua BianDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Feijiang WangDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Fuzheng ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Buhai WangCancer Institute of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China.
Hongping ZhouDirector of Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Nanjing Benq Medicalcenter, Nanjing, China.
Chong ZhouDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xuzhou Center Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Li YinDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xuesong JiangDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ning JiangDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jianfeng WuDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Juying LiuDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Dan SongDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xia HeDepartment of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7314-1002
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNJiangsu University · CNJiangnan University · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing Medical University · CNNorthern Jiangsu People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of raltitrexed (Saiweijian

methodsEligible patients (N = 135) were allocated randomly in a ratio of 1:1 to receive CCRT with either SP or FP. At least 2 cycles of chemotherapy was administrated during radiotherapy. Progression free survival (PFS) was primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), loco-regional relapse free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and toxicity.

resultsIn this study, 68 patients received SP as CCRT, and 67 received FP. Objective responses were noted in 97.1% of the patients in the SP group and in 97.0% of the patients in the FP group (P = 1.00). At the end of a median 36 months follow-up period, the estimated 3-year PFS rates were 70.1% for SP and 66.6% for FP, respectively. The 3-year LRRFS, DMFS and OS rates were 88.9%, 74.7% and 84.0%, respectively, for the SP group, and 92.3%, 71.0% and 73.7%, respectively, for the FP group. Overall, there was no difference between treatment groups with regard to response or survival. The most frequent acute toxicities monitored in both groups were bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal side effects and oral mucositis (OM). The overall incidence of grade 3-4 OM in the FP group (47.8%) was higher than in the SP group (11.8%). However, the incidence of other adverse effects observed in both groups was similar (P > .05).

conclusionsThese data indicate that SP and FP therapies have similar efficacy in treating LA-NPC. The SP regimen showed a tolerable safety profile along with a lower frequency of severe OM and therefore, an improved life quality. In conclusion, SP was a well tolerated, effective, regimen for LA-NPC treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone MarrowChemoradiotherapyChi-Square DistributionCisplatinFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsProgression-Free SurvivalQuinazolinesCisplatinFluorouracilQuinazolinesraltitrexedThiophenesconcurrent chemoradiotherapynasopharyngeal carcinomaraltitrexedtolerability

Identifiers

PMID32657029
PMCPMC7476844
OpenAlexW3042195331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.