Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657015›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2020

Barriers and facilitators to growth monitoring and promotion in Nepal: Household, health worker and female community health volunteer perceptions.

Madeline M Pollifrone, Kenda Cunningham, Pooja Pandey Rana, Morgan M Philbin, Shraddha Manandhar, Krishna P Lamsal, Raj Nandan Mandal, Vikash Deuja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madeline M PollifroneDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8342-2003
Kenda CunninghamHelen Keller International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-1349
Pooja Pandey RanaHelen Keller International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Morgan M PhilbinDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7608-7921
Shraddha ManandharHelen Keller International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-9065
Krishna P LamsalNepali Technical Assistance Group, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-5365-1251
Raj Nandan MandalFHI 360, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Vikash DeujaHelen Keller International, Lalitpur, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth monitoring and promotion (GMP) is both a service for diagnosing inadequate child growth in its earliest stages and a delivery platform for nutrition counselling. The widespread use of GMP services in developing countries has the potential to substantially reduce persistent child undernutrition through early diagnosis and by linking caregivers and their children to key health and nutrition services. However, researchers have questioned the effectiveness of GMP services, which are frequently undermined by underdeveloped health systems and inconsistent implementation. This analysis examined both supply- and demand-side factors for GMP utility in Nepal from the perspectives of beneficiaries and service providers, particularly focusing on three components of GMP: growth assessment, analysis of growth status and counselling. The most common factors influencing GMP uptake included beneficiaries' perceptions of the relative importance of GMP and the knowledge and skill of frontline workers. Both providers and beneficiaries viewed GMP as a secondary health and nutrition activity and therefore less important than curative services. We found deficits in GMP-related knowledge and skills among providers (i.e. health workers and female community health volunteers), as well as indications of poor training quality and coverage. Furthermore, we found variation in GMP utilization by maternal age, education and residency (alone, nuclear or extended), as well as household socio-economic well-being and rurality. This study is the first to assess factors influencing both beneficiaries and service providers for GMP utilization. Further research is needed to explore the implementation of improved GMP protocols and to evaluate facility-level implementation barriers.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersPublic HealthChildFemaleHealth PromotionHumansNepalPerceptionVolunteerschild nutritioncommunity health workersgrowthgrowth monitoringhealth facilitiesNepal

Identifiers

PMID32657015
PMCPMC7507439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.