ArticleEMBO reports2020
Data sharing platforms and the academic evaluation system.
Article in EMBO reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.Wellcome open research · 2021Pooled it
- Technological innovation in healthcare: challenges, opportunities and impact on sustainability.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Unmasking the ethical dimensions of data-sharing in health research: perspectives from researchers at a public university in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- A guide to developing harmonized research workflows in a team science context.Experimental neurology · 2025Review
- Does the use of unusual combinations of datasets contribute to greater scientific impact?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Review
- An agenda-setting paper on data sharing platforms: euCanSHare workshop.Open research Europe · 2021Article
- Data sharing platforms and the academic evaluation system.EMBO reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data-level metrics could encourage scientists to openly share data - a goal of Open Science - if these DLMs became part of the academic reward system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.