Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32656685›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Bone shadow segmentation from ultrasound data for orthopedic surgery using GAN.

Ahmed Z Alsinan, Vishal M Patel, Ilker Hacihaliloglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identifying visible tissue in intraoperative ultrasound: a method and application.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Feasibility of tracked ultrasound registration for pelvic-abdominal tumor navigation: a patient study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmed Z AlsinanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA. ahmed.alsinan@rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-4788
Vishal M PatelDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ilker HacihalilogluDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Funding

North American Spine Society 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReal-time, two (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) has been investigated as a potential alternative to fluoroscopy imaging in various surgical and non-surgical orthopedic procedures. However, low signal to noise ratio, imaging artifacts and bone surfaces appearing several millimeters (mm) in thickness have hindered the wide spread adaptation of this safe imaging modality. Limited field of view and manual data collection cause additional problems during US-based orthopedic procedures. In order to overcome these limitations various bone segmentation and registration methods have been developed. Acoustic bone shadow is an important image artifact used to identify the presence of bone boundaries in the collected US data. Information about bone shadow region can be used (1) to guide the orthopedic surgeon or clinician to a standardized diagnostic viewing plane with minimal artifacts, (2) as a prior feature to improve bone segmentation and registration.

methodIn this work, we propose a computational method, based on a novel generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture, to segment bone shadow images from in vivo US scans in real-time. We also show how these segmented shadow images can be incorporated, as a proxy, to a multi-feature guided convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture for real-time and accurate bone surface segmentation. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation studies are performed on 1235 scans collected from 27 subjects using two different US machines. Finally, we provide qualitative and quantitative comparison results against state-of-the-art GANs.

resultsWe have obtained mean dice coefficient (± standard deviation) of [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) for bone shadow segmentation, showing that the method is in close range with manual expert annotation. Statistical significant improvements against state-of-the-art GAN methods (paired t-test [Formula: see text]) is also obtained. Using the segmented bone shadow features average bone localization accuracy of 0.11 mm ([Formula: see text]) was achieved.

conclusionsReported accurate and robust results make the proposed method promising for various orthopedic procedures. Although we did not investigate in this work, the segmented bone shadow images could also be used as an additional feature to improve accuracy of US-based registration methods. Further extensive validations are required in order to fully understand the clinical utility of the proposed method.

Indexed as

FluoroscopyNeural Networks, ComputerUltrasonographyAcousticsAlgorithmsArtifactsBone and BonesBone DiseasesComputer SimulationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsReproducibility of ResultsBoneDeep learningGenerative adversarial networkOrthopedic surgerySegmentationUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.