ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Experience with similar biologic rituximab in 77 patients of granulomatosis with polyangiitis-a real-life experience.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05716334 (Biosimilars of Rituximab in ANCA-associated Vasculitis Compared to the Originator), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biosimilars of Rituximab in ANCA-associated Vasculitis Compared to the Originator (BRAVO): a CanVasc Multicentre Study
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Similarity of Biosimilars and Reference Drugs: A Comprehensive Review and New Hope for Public Health in a New Frontier.Current drug research reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Incidence of serious infections in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis receiving immunosuppressive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Biosimilar Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Compared to the Originator: A Multicenter Cohort Study.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Review
- Two Decades Rituximab Therapy in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Associated Vasculitis.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review.Biology · 2022Review
- Secular Trends of Incidence, Prevalence, and Healthcare Economic Burden in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: An Analysis of the 2002-2018 South Korea National Health Insurance Database.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Managing ANCA-associated vasculitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an online survey.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Rituximab Induction and Maintenance in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Biosimilars for vasculitis: promise requires validation by quality studies.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Is it time to say goodbye to weekly rituximab in ANCA vasculitis?Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Response to: Biosimilars for vasculitis: promise requires validation by quality studies.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo present single centre experience on the efficacy and safety of similar biologic of rituximab in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).
methodsThis was a retrospective study of GPA patients who received similar biologic of rituximab as either remission induction or maintenance agent. Demographic parameters, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS-v3), vasculitis damage index, relapse and adverse events were retrieved from patient records. Outcomes noted were remission at 6 months in remission induction group and rates of relapses, adverse events, serious infections and mortality in both remission induction and maintenance groups.
resultsSeventy-seven GPA patients were enrolled. Sixty received rituximab for induction and 57 for maintenance; 69% were anti PR-3 positive. In the induction group, median BVAS-v3 reduced from 12 (IQR 6-21.5) to 0 (0-1) at 6 months. At 6 months, 60% patients attained remission, 40% in primary induction group and 74% in re-induction group (p = 0.016%). In the maintenance group, seven (12%) patients had relapses with median time to relapse of 12 (6-22) months. Median relapse free survival was 21 (6-22) months on rituximab maintenance. There were 12 deaths (15.6%) and 18 serious infections.
conclusionSimilar biologic of rituximab was an effective agent for remission induction and remission maintenance in patients with GPA. Head to head trials with innovator molecule are needed to confirm these results. KEY POINTS: • Remission was achieved in 60% of GPA patients who received similar biologic of rituximab as remission induction therapy. • Relapse rate during maintenance phase was 12% with similar biologic of rituximab. Serious infections and mortality with similar biologic of rituximab were comparable with that reported previously in AAV trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32656662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.