Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32656643›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020

Degradation of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA after γ-irradiation and its effect on forensic genotyping.

Corey Goodwin, Andrew Wotherspoon, Michelle E Gahan, Dennis McNevin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Corey GoodwinNational Centre for Forensic Studies, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia. cgoodwin.research@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3279-4840
Andrew WotherspoonLife Sciences Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, New South Wales, 2234, Australia.
Michelle E GahanNational Centre for Forensic Studies, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Dennis McNevinNational Centre for Forensic Studies, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
University of Canberra · AUAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering ALNSTU11896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic genotyping can be impeded by γ-irradiation of biological evidence in the event of radiological crime; that is, criminal activity involving radioactive material. Oxidative effects within the mitochondria of living cells elicits greater damage to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) than nuclear DNA (nuDNA) at low doses. This study presents a novel approach for the assessment of nuDNA versus mtDNA damage from a comparison of genotype and quantity data, while exploring likely mechanisms for differential damage after high doses of γ-irradiation. Liquid (hydrated) and dried (dehydrated) whole blood samples were exposed to high doses of γ-radiation (1-50 kilogray, kGy). The GlobalFiler PCR Amplification Kit was used to evaluate short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping efficacy and nuDNA degradation; a comparison was made to mtDNA degradation measured using real-time PCR assays. Each assay was normalized before comparison by calculation of integrity indices relative to unirradiated controls. Full STR profiles were attainable up to the highest dose, although DNA degradation was noticeable after 10 and 25 kGy for hydrated and dehydrated blood, respectively. This was manifested by heterozygote imbalance more than allele dropout. Degradation was greater for mtDNA than nuDNA, as well as for hydrated than dehydrated cells, after equivalent doses. Oxidative effects due to water radiolysis and mitochondrial function are dominant mechanisms of differential damage to nuDNA versus mtDNA after high-dose γ-irradiation. While differential DNA damage was reduced by cell desiccation, its persistence after drying indicates innate differences between nuDNA and mtDNA radioresistance and/or continued oxidative effects within the mitochondria.

Indexed as

Gamma RaysGenotypeDNA Degradation, NecroticDNA FingerprintingDNA, MitochondrialDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, MitochondrialDegradationForensicsGenotypingMitochondrial DNANuclear DNAγ-Radiation

Identifiers

PMID32656643
OpenAlexW3041537924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.