Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32656530›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2020

The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: a community and health service partnership in Western Australia.

Samar M Aoun, Julian Abel, Bruce Rumbold, Kate Cross, Jo Moore, Piari Skeers, Luc Deliens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Global Research Trend and Bibliometric Analysis of Current Studies on End-of-Life Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Supporting the dying is a community responsibility.Palliative care and social practice · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samar M AounPublic Health Palliative Care Unit, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4073-4805
Julian AbelDirector, Compassionate Communities, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-5557
Bruce RumboldPublic Health Palliative Care Unit, Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kate CrossWA Primary Health Alliance, Rivervale, WA, Australia.
Jo MooreWA Country Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia.
Piari SkeersWA Country Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an international drive towards increasing provision of community-led models of social and practical support for people living with advanced illness.

aimThis feasibility project aims to develop, implement and evaluate a model of community volunteers, identified as Compassionate Communities Connectors, to support people living with advanced life limiting illnesses/palliative care needs. The aims also include the development and evaluation of a training programme for volunteers and assessment of the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of this model of care.

methodsThe approach seeks to map and mobilise people's personal networks of care through the Connectors enlisting Caring Helpers (community volunteers). Up to 10 Connectors will be trained to work with at least 30 families selected by the palliative care service as requiring support. The primary outcome is the effect of the intervention on social connectedness. Secondary outcomes are the intervention's effect on unplanned hospital utilisation, caregiver support needs, advance care plans and satisfaction with intervention for patients/carers, volunteers and service providers.

conclusionIt is expected that this intervention will enhance patient, carer and family social, psychological and practical support and reduce the need for dying people to be admitted to a hospital.

Indexed as

Caring HelpersCommunity ConnectorsCompassionate Communitiesend-of-life carefamily carerspalliative carepractical supportsocial connectednesssocial supportvolunteers

Identifiers

PMID32656530
PMCPMC7333490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.