Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32656506›Full record

ArticleJournal of STEM outreach2018

Charles Darwin Synthetic Interview: A 19th Century Scientist Speaks in the 21

David J Lampe, Brinley Kantorski, John A Pollock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of STEM outreach, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David J LampeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bayer School of Natural and Environmental Science.
Brinley KantorskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bayer School of Natural and Environmental Science.
John A PollockDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bayer School of Natural and Environmental Science.

Funding

A Partnership in Neuroscience EducationR25OD016516 · OD · DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLOCK, JOHN ARCHIE · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
A Partnership in Neuroscience EducationR25GM129180 · NIGMS · DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLOCK, JOHN ARCHIE · 2018 to 2018
$255k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM129180NIH HHS R25 OD016516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charles Darwin is largely unknown and poorly understood as a historical figure. Similarly the fundamental principles of evolution are often misstated, misunderstood, or entirely rejected by large numbers of Americans. Simply trying to communicate more facts about Darwin, or facts supporting the principles of evaluation, is inadequate; neither students nor members of the public will care or retain the information. On the contrary, building facts into a one-on-one conversational narrative creates a memorable opportunity to learn. Here we create a digital media, self-guided question and answer 'synthetic interview' with Charles Darwin. Questions are derived from a survey of nearly 1,000 people. Answers spoken by an actor portraying Darwin are derived from Darwin's own writings. Questions on modern topics are answered by scientists, theologians, and lawyers. First produced as a museum exhibit and then later reproduced as an app (iOS/Android), the Darwin Synthetic Interview has been evaluated with more than 3,000 surveyed users, of which 69% indicated that they learned and more than 75% would recommend the experience. Students who interacted with the synthetic interview in a classroom setting found answers were unexpected and clarifying. Using a format of personal narrative, the Darwin Synthetic Interview creates a new way to engage students and the public in a process of self-directed discovery of a topic that is often considered difficult to teach.

Indexed as

Charles DarwinDigital MediaEvolutionSynthetic Interview

Identifiers

PMID32656506
PMCPMC7351126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.