Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32656460›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

Improvement of Electronic Health Record Integrated Transition Planning Tools in Primary Care.

Jack Rusley, Kathy Tomaszewski, Julia Kim, Larnce Robinson, Kadi-Ann Rose, Caroline Aronin, Matthew Molloy, Renata Arrington-Sanders

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack RusleyDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Kathy TomaszewskiDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Julia KimDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Larnce RobinsonDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Kadi-Ann RoseDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Caroline AroninDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Matthew MolloyDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Renata Arrington-SandersDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe transition from pediatric to adult care is under-studied in primary care. Electronic health record-integrated transition planning tools (ETPTs) can facilitate the transition. We tested whether ETPTs and clinician reminders increase the frequency of transition discussions during adolescent well-visits.

methodsIn an academic adolescent medicine primary care practice serving a predominantly African American, Medicaid-insured population, we developed 4 ETPTs-readiness assessment, plan template, information handout, and diagnosis code. We used Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement cycles to implement ETPTs and measure outcomes. Each cycle added a new layer of clinician support: (1) ETPT training, (2) visual reminders, (3) incentives, and (4) daily reminders. The primary outcome was the proportion of well-visits in which "any ETPT use" occurred. We collected data via chart review and used run charts and regression analyses with multiple comparisons to detect differences between cycles. Clinicians-provided feedback was elicited.

resultsAny ETPT use increased from 0% to 45% between baseline and cycle 4. The odds of any ETPT use was ten times larger in cycle 4 compared to cycle 1 (odds ratio 10.09, 95% confidence interval 2.29-44.44,

conclusionsDaily reminders combined with training and visual reminders were effective in increasing the use of ETPTs in primary care. Future interventions should adapt existing transition tools to the needs of target populations and create regular reminders to facilitate uptake.

Identifiers

PMID32656460
PMCPMC7297398
OpenAlexW3027581481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.