ReviewACS omega2020
Metallic Nanoislands on Graphene for Biomechanical Sensing.
Review in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flexible tactile sensors based on gold nanoparticles-precipitated carbon nanotubes with low contact resistance and high sensitivity.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Optics-Free, In Situ Swelling Monitoring of Articular Cartilage with Graphene Strain Sensors.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This minireview describes a nanomaterial-based multimodal sensor for performing biomechanical measurements. The sensor consists of ultrathin metallic films on single-layer graphene. This composite material exhibits physical properties that neither material possesses alone. For example, the metal, deposited by evaporation at low (≤10 nm) nominal thicknesses, renders the film highly sensitive to mechanical stimuli, which can be detected using electrical (i.e., resistance) and optical (i.e., plasmonic) modalities. The electrical modality, in particular, is capable of resolving deformations as small as 0.0001% engineering strain, or 1 ppm. The electrical and optical responses of the composite films can be tailored by controlling the morphology of the metallic film. This morphology (granular or island-like when deposited onto the graphene) can be tuned using the conditions of deposition, the identity of the substrate beneath the graphene, or even the replacement of the graphene for hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). This material responds to forces produced by a range of physiological structures, from the contractions of heart muscle cells, to the beating of the heart through the skin, to stretching of the skin due to the expansion of the lungs and movement of limbs. Here, we provide an update on recent applications of this material in fields ranging from cardiovascular medicine (by measuring the contractions of 2D monolayers of cardiomyocytes), regenerative medicine (optical measurements of the forces produced by myoblasts), speech pathology and physical therapy (measuring swallowing function in head and neck cancer survivors), lab-on-a-chip devices (using deformation of sidewalls of microfluidic channels to detect transiting objects), and sleep medicine (measuring pulse and respiration with a wearable, unobtrusive device). We also discuss the mechanisms by which these films detect strain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.