Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32656276›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of community based nursing and midwifery2020

Knowledge Valuation by Iranian Women with High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

Zahra Shojaeian, Talat Khadivzadeh, Ali Sahebi, Hossein Kareshki, Fatemeh Tara

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of community based nursing and midwifery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Care Providers' Perspectives on Quality Prenatal Care in High-risk Pregnancies: A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zahra ShojaeianDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Talat KhadivzadehNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ali SahebiAssistant Professor of Clinical Psychology, Senior Faculty of The William Glaser institute, Sydney, Australia.
Hossein KareshkiDepartment of Counseling Educational Psychology, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Fatemeh TaraResearch Center for Patient Safety, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGaining adequate knowledge about high-risk pregnancy (HRP) and correct understanding of the condition, empowers women to improve the use of prenatal care, practice better self-care, and reduce the risk of pregnancy complications. The present study aimed to assess the valuation of knowledge by Iranian women with HRP.

methodsThe present qualitative study was conducted on 25 women with HRP from August 2017 to August 2018 at various educational hospitals in Mashhad, Iran. The data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews. The data collection process continued until data saturation. The data were analyzed using the conventional content analysis method and MAXQDA software (version10.0). Data collection and data analysis were conducted concurrently.

resultsBased on the analysis of the interviews, two main categories and eight sub-categories were extracted. The main categories were "Positive valuation of credible problem-relevant knowledge" and "Avoidance of misleading and stressful information". The results showed that various factors had a positive impact on knowledge gathering, namely personal and other people's experiences, obtaining need-based information, sympathetic advice from others, and faith-based health recommendations. On the other hand, factors that had a negative impact were related to the type of information that caused stress, was unreliable, inefficient or incompatible with personal goals.

conclusionThe findings of the present study would help health care providers to offer suitable and empathetic counseling to women with HRP. Providing valid and accessible sources of information will lead to faster and timely referrals of such patients.

Indexed as

High-risk pregnancyKnowledgeValuation

Identifiers

PMID32656276
PMCPMC7334747
OpenAlexW3037733909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.