Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32656252›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase.

Bishnu Adhikari, Se-Ran Jun, Young M Kwon, Aaron S Kiess, Pratima Adhikari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bishnu AdhikariDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Se-Ran JunDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Young M KwonDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Aaron S KiessDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Pratima AdhikariDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to animal welfare issues, European Union has banned the use of conventional cages (CC) and non-EU countries including the US are also under constant public pressure to restrict their use in egg production. Very limited information is available on the composition of the microbial community of hens raised in different housing environments. This study was conducted to determine the effects of CC and enriched colony cages (EC) on cecal microbiota of two commercial laying hen strains, Hy-Line W36 (W36) and Hy-Line Brown (HB) during the late production stage (53, 58, 67, and 72 weeks of age). Cecal microbiota was studied by analyzing 16S rRNA gene sequences with Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) 2 ver. 2018.8. Differentially abundant taxa were identified by Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (

Indexed as

cecal microbiotaegg (production)henhousing environmentHy-Line

Identifiers

PMID32656252
PMCPMC7324799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.