Review3 Biotech2020
Safety and efficacy concerns of modern strategies of local anesthetics delivery.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Enantiomeric Excess Bupivacaine in a Lavender Oil NLC Tested in a Melanoma Model: Prolonged Release and Anticancer Effect.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Polymeric Nanocapsules Loaded with Lidocaine: A Promising Formulation for Topical Dental Anesthesia.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Low-Frequency Sonophoresis: A Promising Strategy for Enhanced Transdermal Delivery.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Review
- Development of a Dosage form for a Photoswitchable Local Anesthetic Ethercaine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Synthesis and Evaluation of the Effects of Nanoparticles of Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin on Cuprizone-Induced Demyelination: Modulation of the Nrf2/NF-kB Signaling Pathway.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last few decades, several formulations have evolved to realize better efficacy of administered anesthesia. These innovative formulations have facilitated surgeons to perform operations under purely local anesthesia, which provides extra protection and comfort to patients. Ease of delivery of local anesthesia is the need of the current generation, because some of the standard procedures are performed without the use of any sedative agent. Therefore, we are presenting here the various approaches of administration of local anesthetics by the surgeons. To construct a comprehensive report on various methods of anesthesia, we followed a systematic literature search of bibliographic databases of published articles recently in the international journals and publishers of repute. A comprehensive study of several reports of the field indicates that there are significant progresses towards developing novel formulations of anesthesia drugs as well as strategies of delivery. Among formulations, nanoparticle-based delivery approaches, including polymeric, liposomal, and micellar structures, have offered the much needed efficacy with low toxicity. Therefore, several of such techniques are at various stages of clinical trials. Nanotechnology-based delivery approaches have significantly emerged in recent past due to the low systemic toxicity and better efficacy of the nonconventional local anesthetics. The other methods of local anesthesia delivery such as transdermal, magnetophoresis, electrophoresis, and iontophoresis are frequently used due to them being minimally invasive and locally effective. Therefore, the combination of the nanotechnological methods with above mentioned techniques would significantly enhance the overall process of local anesthesia delivery and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.