Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655892›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2020

Distal radius fractures in the elderly population.

Toni Luokkala, Minna K Laitinen, Teemu P Hevonkorpi, Lauri Raittio, Ville M Mattila, Antti P Launonen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Major Upper-Extremity Fractures in Older Adults: Predictors of 5-Year Mortality.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toni LuokkalaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Minna K LaitinenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Teemu P HevonkorpiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Lauri RaittioFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Ville M MattilaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Antti P LaunonenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3125-0171
Tampere University Hospital · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We found no clear evidence of the clinical superiority of distal radius fracture surgery among older adults at one year.Surgical treatment, however, may yield a faster recovery to previous level of activity in elderly patients.With operative treatment, hardware-based problems may warrant secondary operations and implant removal, whereas in non-operative treatment, symptomatic loss of alignment and malunion can occur.In elderly patients, non-operative treatment can be considered to be the gold standard. Cite this article:

Indexed as

distal radius fractureelderlyolder adultsRCTreview

Identifiers

PMID32655892
PMCPMC7336190
OpenAlexW3035874231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.