Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655888›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2020

Prognostic factors in ankle sprains: a review.

José Nuno Ferreira, João Vide, Daniel Mendes, João Protásio, Rui Viegas, Manuel Resende Sousa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José Nuno FerreiraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Portugal.
João VideDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Portugal.
Daniel MendesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Portugal.
João ProtásioDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Portugal.
Rui ViegasDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Portugal.
Manuel Resende SousaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital da Luz, Portugal.
Hospital Beatriz Ângelo · PTHospital da Luz · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries, being the most frequent musculoskeletal trauma among athletes.Most of these injuries are successfully treated conservatively; however, up to 70% of patients can develop long-lasting symptoms. Therefore, understanding prognostic factors for an ankle sprain could help clinicians identify patients with poor prognosis and choose the right treatment.A suggested approach will be presented in order to positively identify the factors that should warrant a more aggressive attitude in the initial conservative treatment.There are some prognostic factors linked to a better recovery and outcome; nevertheless, prognostic factors for full recovery after initial ankle sprain are not consistent. Cite this article:

Indexed as

ankle sprainsprognostic factors in ankle sprains

Identifiers

PMID32655888
PMCPMC7336189
OpenAlexW3033020557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.