ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020
Cigarette smoking affects the differences between male and female phenotypes.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unburdening healthcare systems through telenursing in chronic respiratory disease management: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Association between smoking and anemia in adult women in Peru: analysis of a national survey (ENDES) 2023.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The association of cigarette smoking with the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy: based on cross-sectional survey and mendelian randomization.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Is a Low Dosage of Medical Cannabis Effective for Treating Pain Related to Fibromyalgia? A Pilot Study and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Sex-Gender-Based Differences in Metabolic Diseases.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023Review
- The Person's Care Requires a Sex and Gender Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Just a Reflection: Does Drug Repurposing Perpetuate Sex-Gender Bias in the Safety Profile?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Questioning the sex-specific differences in the association of smoking on the survival rate of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSex-gender medicine focuses on differences and similarities in health and disease between men and women. The present study focused on the existence of male and female phenotypes when routine demographic, biochemical and haematological data are considered and aimed to determine the influence of smoking on phenotypes and evaluate the role of body weight on sex-gender differences in view of the fact that some of them can be utilized as biomarkers of diagnosis, diseases and therapeutic response.
methodsEighty-five healthy young adult men (27 smokers and 58 non-smokers) and 85 women (32 smokers and 53 non-smokers) well matched for age were enrolled. 31 haematochemical parameters were measured and data were analysed before and after normalization for body weight applying the two-way analysis of variance and principal component analysis (PCA).
resultsIn non-smoking cohorts, there were numerous sex-gender differences and PCA analysis distinguished two different phenotypes: males and females. Body weight normalization induced qualitatively and quantitatively changes, but male and female phenotypes were still well evident. Smoking influenced numerous parameters and PCA analysis evidenced that these changes led to the abolition of male and female phenotypes.
conclusionsPersonalized medicine has the goals to study modification of markers profile in the single individual, which is strongly influenced by sex-gender and smoking habit. In non-smokers, male and female phenotypes are present independently from the quantitation method used. In smokers only one phenotype is present. These results suggest that smoking and sex-gender should be considered as an independent variable in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32655825PMC7344104W3043578674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.