Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655802›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020

New proposed tumor-node-metastasis staging system for medullary thyroid carcinoma based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Min Wang, Di Hu, Wen Zeng, Sichao Chen, Yihui Huang, Ling Zhou, Wei Zhou, Wei Wei, Chao Zhang, Zeming Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Min WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Di HuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Wen ZengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Sichao ChenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Yihui HuangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Ling ZhouDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Wei ZhouDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Pediatrics, St John Hospital and Medical Center Detroit, MI, USA.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430030, China.
Zeming LiuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.
Liang GuoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has been separated into its own chapter in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. However, controversies still exist for the staging of MTC. This study aimed to identify prognostic differences among patients with MTC to define a more accurate staging system.

methodsData on cancer-specific survival from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2014 were used for this study. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and mortality per 1000-person-years were used to evaluate the mortality rate to create the new staging system.

resultsA total of 960 cases were included in this analysis. The mortality rates of 24 different groups, which were classified using T stage (T1-4), N stage (N0-1b), and M stage (M0-1) were assessed using K-M curves. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and mortality per 1000-person-years were used to classify patients, as stage I (T1-3N0-1aM0, 654, 68.34%), stage II (T1-3N1bM0, 181, 18.91%), stage III (T4N0-1bM0, 58, 6.06%), and stage IV (T1-4N0-1bM1, 64, 6.69%). The hazard ratios of stages II, III, and IV, using stage I as a reference, were 5.281 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.236-22.562), 20.603 (95% CI, 4.400-96.467), and 55.717 (95% CI, 14.307-216.988), respectively. The mortality rates per 1000-person-years of stages I, II, III, and IV were 2.036 (95% CI, 0.657-6.312), 14.867 (95% CI, 6.679-33.092), 98.287 (95% CI, 54.432-177.478), and 224.199 (95% CI, 146.180-343.860), respectively.

conclusionsCompared with the current AJCC tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for MTC, this new proposed TNM staging system, which is based on cancer-specific mortality rate analysis, provides more accurate risk stratification and can ensure more rational treatment measures.

Indexed as

AJCC staging systemMedullary thyroid carcinomaSEERTNM staging system

Identifiers

PMID32655802
PMCPMC7344094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.