ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2020
Diagnostic Accuracy of Single Spot Urine for Detecting Renal Uric Acid Underexcretion in Men.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute effects of moderate intensity exercise on uric acid excretion in underexcretion hyperuricemia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe uric acid (UA) clearance test to evaluate the hyperuricemia phenotype requires a great deal of time. However, the utility of single spot urine is scarce. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of single spot urine for predicting renal UA underexcretion (the decreased UA excretion) in men.
methodsA total of 73 male participants aged 20 - 74 years with a UA level of 6.0 - 7.9 mg/dL were enrolled in the study. Renal UA underexcretion was defined as < 7.3 mL/min using the 60-min method. Urinary UA to creatinine ratio (UACR), fractional clearance of urate (FCU), and the Simkin index were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic utility of these parameters for predicting UA underexcretion.
resultsIn the ROC analysis, the area under the curve values of the UACR, FCU, and the Simkin index for predicting UA underexcretion were 0.903 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.830 - 0.976), 0.841 (95% CI: 0.749 - 0.933), and 0.779 (95% CI: 0.673 - 0.885), respectively. An optimal UACR cutoff of 0.460 (sensitivity 89.2%, specificity 80.6%, overall diagnostic accuracy 84.9%, positive predictive value 82.5%, and negative predictive value 87.9%) was identified.
conclusionsThese results suggest that the UACR is a simple and efficient test with high sensitivity and specificity levels for predicting renal UA underexcretion in men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.