Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655681›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020

An Automated Workflow for Hemodynamic Computations in Cerebral Aneurysms.

Cosmin-Ioan Nita, Takashi Suzuki, Lucian Mihai Itu, Viorel Mihalef, Hiroyuki Takao, Yuichi Murayama, Puneet Sharma, Thomas Redel, Saikiran Rapaka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Cosmin-Ioan NitaTransilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-5769
Takashi SuzukiDepartment of Innovation for Medical Information Technology, Research Center for Medical Science, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Lucian Mihai ItuTransilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-497X
Viorel MihalefSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Princeton, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-4505
Hiroyuki TakaoDepartment of Innovation for Medical Information Technology, Research Center for Medical Science, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-9642
Yuichi MurayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-385X
Puneet SharmaSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Princeton, USA.
Thomas RedelSiemens Healthineers GmbH, Advanced Therapies, Forchheim, Germany.
Saikiran RapakaSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Princeton, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6527-0974
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPSiemens (United States) · USTransylvania University of Brașov · ROSiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a valuable tool for investigating hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms. CFD provides flow-related quantities, which have been shown to have a potential impact on aneurysm growth and risk of rupture. However, the adoption of CFD tools in clinical settings is currently limited by the high computational cost and the engineering expertise required for employing these tools, e.g., for mesh generation, appropriate choice of spatial and temporal resolution, and of boundary conditions. Herein, we address these challenges by introducing a practical and robust methodology, focusing on computational performance and minimizing user interaction through automated parameter selection. We propose a fully automated pipeline that covers the steps from a patient-specific anatomical model to results, based on a fast, graphics processing unit- (GPU-) accelerated CFD solver and a parameter selection methodology. We use a reduced order model to compute the initial estimates of the spatial and temporal resolutions and an iterative approach that further adjusts the resolution during the simulation without user interaction. The pipeline and the solver are validated based on previously published results, and by comparing the results obtained for 20 cerebral aneurysm cases with those generated by a state-of-the-art commercial solver (Ansys CFX, Canonsburg PA). The automatically selected spatial and temporal resolutions lead to results which closely agree with the state-of-the-art, with an average relative difference of only 2%. Due to the GPU-based parallelization, simulations are computationally efficient, with a median computation time of 40 minutes per simulation.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularBlood Flow VelocityCerebrovascular CirculationComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHemodynamicsHumansHydrodynamicsImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial AneurysmPatient-Specific ModelingWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID32655681
PMCPMC7317611
OpenAlexW3036940684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.