Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655532›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020

Biocides and Novel Antimicrobial Agents for the Mitigation of Coronaviruses.

Govindaraj Dev Kumar, Abhinav Mishra, Laurel Dunn, Anna Townsend, Ikechukwu Chukwuma Oguadinma, Kelly R Bright, Charles P Gerba

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of 1% HInternational dental journal · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Direct Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein by Peracetic Acid.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Virucidal Efficacy of Laundering.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Govindaraj Dev KumarCenter for Food Safety, The University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.
Abhinav MishraDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Laurel DunnDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Anna TownsendDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Ikechukwu Chukwuma OguadinmaCenter for Food Safety, The University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.
Kelly R BrightDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Charles P GerbaDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
University of Georgia · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In December, 2019, a highly infectious and rapidly spreading new pneumonia of unknown cause was reported to the Chinese WHO Country Office. A cluster of these cases had appeared in Wuhan, a city in the Hubei Province of China. These infections were found to be caused by a new coronavirus which was given the name "2019 novel coronavirus" (2019-nCoV). It was later renamed "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2," or SARS-CoV-2 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses on February 11, 2020. It was named SARS-CoV-2 due to its close genetic similarity to the coronavirus which caused the SARS outbreak in 2002 (SARS-CoV-1). The aim of this review is to provide information, primarily to the food industry, regarding a range of biocides effective in eliminating or reducing the presence of coronaviruses from fomites, skin, oral/nasal mucosa, air, and food contact surfaces. As several EPA approved sanitizers against SARS-CoV-2 are commonly used by food processors, these compounds are primarily discussed as much of the industry already has them on site and is familiar with their application and use. Specifically, we focused on the effects of alcohols, povidone iodine, quaternary ammonium compounds, hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), peroxyacetic acid (PAA), chlorine dioxide, ozone, ultraviolet light, metals, and plant-based antimicrobials. This review highlights the differences in the resistance or susceptibility of different strains of coronaviruses, or similar viruses, to these antimicrobial agents.

Indexed as

antimicrobialbiocidecoronavirusCOVID-19disinfectionmitigationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32655532
PMCPMC7324725
OpenAlexW3037182550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.