ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020
Topical Nifedipine Administration for Secondary Prevention in Frostbitten Patients.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frostbite is a cold-related injury with a growing incidence among healthy subjects. Sequelae after frostbite are frequent and vary among individuals. Here, we studied the thermal response in the digits of hands and feet of five subjects who had recovered from previous frostbite, except for their lasting sequelae. We considered three different conditions: digits unaffected by frostbite nor sequelae (healthy), those affected but which did not suffer amputation (frostbitten without amputation), and the remainder/stumps of digits that underwent partial amputation (frostbitten with amputation). Three consecutive immersions in cold water (8°C; 3 min) interspersed by 1 minute of thermal recovery were performed. After 30 min, a topical 10% nifedipine preparation was applied to hands and feet, and the same cold exposure protocol to evaluate its effect was followed. In basal condition and immediately after each immersion, the temperature of individual digits was assessed using thermography. We observed different thermal responses among the different digits of hands and feet, even without the nifedipine treatment. Nifedipine had a cooling effect on healthy and post-amputated tissue without thermal stress. In cold conditions, topic nifedipine application improved the cold response in healthy fingers but had a negative effect on those from which parts had been amputated. The topical nifedipine had detrimental effects on toes in all conditions. Topical nifedipine can help to the preservation of healthy fingers exposed to cold, with adequate thermal insulation; but it is necessary to remark its potentially harmful effects on previously frostbitten tissue. Because of the differences observed on individual regional response to cold, thermography can be a useful tool in the frostbite prevention for subjects habitually exposed to cold environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.