Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655383›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2020

Characterization of Learning, Motivation, and Visual Perception in Five Transgenic Mouse Lines Expressing GCaMP in Distinct Cell Populations.

Peter A Groblewski, Douglas R Ollerenshaw, Justin T Kiggins, Marina E Garrett, Chris Mochizuki, Linzy Casal, Sissy Cross, Kyla Mace, Jackie Swapp, Sahar Manavi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LongitudinalCell reports methods · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Learning, fast and slow.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peter A GroblewskiAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Douglas R OllerenshawAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Justin T KigginsAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Marina E GarrettAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Chris MochizukiAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Linzy CasalAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sissy CrossAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Kyla MaceAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jackie SwappAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sahar ManaviAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Derric WilliamsAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Stefan MihalasAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Shawn R OlsenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the mechanisms of perception and cognition, neural measurements must be made during behavior. A goal of the

Indexed as

change detectionGCaMP transgenic micelearningmotivationmouse behaviorvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID32655383
PMCPMC7324787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.