Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655343›Full record

ArticleMolecular syndromology2020

A Novel

Ömer Aydıner, Veysel S Hançer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular syndromology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ömer AydınerDepartment of Radiology, Kartal Lutfi Kirdar Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Veysel S HançerDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstinye University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is an autosomal dominant disease, also known as EDS type IV. The estimated prevalence for all EDS varies between 1/10,000 and 1/25,000 with EDS type IV representing approximately 5-10% of the cases. The vascular complications may affect all anatomical areas, with a tendency toward arteries of large and medium diameter. vEDS diagnosis is a challenging process. Patients usually have different phenotypic features and are unaware of the diagnosis at the time of initial vascular complications. The authors report the case of a 39-year-old male patient with EDS type IV, who developed internal carotid artery dissection and was diagnosed with clinical findings, imaging modalities, and a novel pathogenic

Indexed as

Carotid arteryIliac arteryPathologic variationPseudoaneurysmSpontaneous dissectionVascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32655343
PMCPMC7325129
OpenAlexW3008676912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.