Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655290›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2019

Repurposing Pathogenic Variants of

Rahul Tyagi, Sumit Kumar, Ashwin Dalal, Faruq Mohammed, Manju Mohanty, Paramvir Kaur, Akshay Anand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role ofAnnals of neurosciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rahul Tyagi1Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India; 3Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sumit Kumar1Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India; 3Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ashwin Dalal1Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India; 3Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Faruq Mohammed1Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India; 3Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Manju Mohanty1Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India; 3Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Paramvir Kaur1Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India; 3Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Akshay Anand1Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India; 3Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, fatal neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations in

objectivesPopulation-based

methodsA total of 100 DMD cases were recruited and Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to obtain the deletion and duplication profile.

resultsCopy number variations (deletion/duplication) were found in 80.85% of unrelated DMD cases. Sixty-eight percent of cases were found to have variations in the distal hotspot region (Exon 45-55) of the

conclusionA major proportion of DMD subjects (80%) could be diagnosed by the MLPA technique. The data generated from our study may be beneficial for strengthening of mutation database in the North Indian population.

Indexed as

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)dystrophinexon skippingMLPAneuromuscular disorderpathogenic variants

Identifiers

PMID32655290
PMCPMC7327972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.