Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32655086›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2020

Abnormal Flow Dynamics Result in Low Wall Shear Stress and High Oscillatory Shear Index in Abdominal Aortic Dilatation: Initial in vivo Assessment with 4D-flow MRI.

Yasuo Takehara, Haruo Isoda, Mamoru Takahashi, Naoki Unno, Norihiko Shiiya, Takasuke Ushio, Satoshi Goshima, Shinji Naganawa, Marcus Alley, Tetsuya Wakayama and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Abdominal applications of quantitative 4D flow MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Wall shear stress and relative residence time as potential risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in males: a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance case-control study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  18. Quality Control for 4D Flow MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Clinical Application of 4D Flow MR Imaging for the Abdominal Aorta.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Technical Background for 4D Flow MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yasuo TakeharaDepartment of Fundamental Development for Advanced Low Invasive Diagnostic Imaging, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine.
Haruo IsodaDepartment of Brain & Mind Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine.
Mamoru TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital.
Naoki UnnoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Hamamatsu Medical Center.
Norihiko ShiiyaFirst Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine.
Takasuke UshioDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine.
Satoshi GoshimaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine.
Marcus AlleyDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Tetsuya WakayamaMR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare Japan.
Atsushi NozakiMR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare Japan.
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPNagoya University · JPHamamatsu Medical Center · JPSeirei Mikatabara General Hospital · JPStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize the non-laminar flow dynamics and resultant decreased wall shear stress (WSS) and high oscillatory shear index (OSI) of the infrarenal abdominal aortic dilatation, cardiac phase-resolved 3D phase-contrast MRI (4D-flow MRI) was performed.

methodsThe prospective single-arm study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and included 18 subjects (median 67.5 years) with the dilated infrarenal aorta (median diameter 35 mm). 4D-flow MRI was conducted on a 1.5T MRI system. On 3D streamline images, laminar and non-laminar (i.e., vortex or helical) flow patterns were visually assessed both for the dilated aorta and for the undilated upstream aorta. Cardiac phase-resolved flow velocities, WSS and OSI, were also measured for the dilated aorta and the upstream undilated aorta.

resultsNon-laminar flow represented by vortex or helical flow was more frequent and overt in the dilated aorta than in the undilated upstream aorta (P < 0.0156) with a very good interobserver agreement (weighted kappa: 0.82-1.0). The WSS was lower, and the OSI was higher on the dilated aortic wall compared with the proximal undilated segments. In mid-systole, mean spatially-averaged WSS was 0.20 ± 0.016 Pa for the dilated aorta vs. 0.68 ± 0.071 Pa for undilated upstream aorta (P < 0.0001), and OSI on the dilated aortic wall was 0.093 ± 0.010 vs. 0.041 ± 0.0089 (P = 0.013). The maximum values and the amplitudes of the WSS at the dilated aorta were inversely proportional to the ratio of dilated/undilated aortic diameter (r = -0.694, P = 0.0014).

conclusion4D-flow can characterize abnormal non-laminar flow dynamics within the dilated aorta in vivo. The wall of the infrarenal aortic dilatation is continuously and increasingly affected by atherogenic stimuli due to the flow disturbances represented by vortex or helical flow, which is reflected by lower WSS and higher OSI.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAorta, AbdominalAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged4D-flowabdominal aortic aneurysmoscillatory shear indexphase-contrast imagewall shear stress

Identifiers

PMID32655086
PMCPMC7553816
OpenAlexW3041761981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.