Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32654802›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2021

Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib for Patients with Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Features: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the IMmotion151 Clinical Trial.

Brian I Rini, Robert J Motzer, Thomas Powles, David F McDermott, Bernard Escudier, Frede Donskov, Robert Hawkins, Sergio Bracarda, Jens Bedke, Ugo De Giorgi and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Brian I RiniVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: brian.rini@vumc.org.
Robert J MotzerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute and the Royal Free Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
David F McDermottBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Bernard EscudierGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Frede DonskovAarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Robert HawkinsThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Sergio BracardaAzienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy.
Jens BedkeUniversity of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ugo De GiorgiIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Camillo PortaIRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Alain RavaudCHU Hopitaux de Bordeaux - Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France.
Francis ParnisAshford Cancer Centre Research, Kurralta Park, SA, Australia.
Enrique GrandeMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Wei ZhangGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mahrukh HuseniGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Susheela CarrollGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Roxana SufanGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christina SchiffGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael B AtkinsGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAzienda Ospedaliera S.Maria · ITBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterHôpital Saint-André · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid · ESMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USQueen Mary University of London · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Tübingen · DEVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features (sRCC) have a poor prognosis and have shown limited responsiveness to inhibition of the VEGF pathway. We conducted a prespecified analysis of the randomised, phase 3 IMmotion151 trial in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic RCC to assess the effectiveness of atezolizumab + bevacizumab versus sunitinib in a subgroup of patients with sarcomatoid features. Patients whose tumour had any component of sarcomatoid features were included and received atezolizumab + bevacizumab (n = 68) or sunitinib (n = 74). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the group receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab overall (8.3 vs 5.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.52 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.79) and in the subset of patients with PD-L1-positive tumours (8.6 vs 5.6 mo; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.77). More patients receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab achieved an objective response (49% vs 14%), including complete responses (10% vs 3%), and reported greater symptom improvements versus sunitinib. Safety was consistent with the known profiles of each drug and with that reported in the overall safety-evaluable population of IMmotion151. This analysis supports enhanced activity of atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients with sRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at patients with a specific type of kidney cancer (tumours with sarcomatoid features) that has been hard to treat. A treatment with two drugs (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) appeared to help patients live longer without the disease getting worse than another drug (sunitinib) that is often used. Patients who took the two drugs also said they were better able to carry out their everyday activities than patients who took sunitinib. The combination of these two drugs may work better in patients with this type of advanced kidney cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabHumansSunitinibAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabBevacizumabPharmaceutical PreparationsSunitinibatezolizumabbevacizumabIMmotion151metastatic renal cell carcinomaRCCsarcomatoidsRCC

Identifiers

PMID32654802
PMCPMC9376009
OpenAlexW3040758576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.