Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32654801›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology2020

Telemedicine and Smart Working: Recommendations of the European Association of Urology.

Moises Rodriguez Socarrás, Stacy Loeb, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Maria J Ribal, Jarka Bloemberg, James Catto, James N'Dow, Hendrik Van Poppel, Juan Gómez Rivas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Telemedicine in Overactive Bladder Syndrome.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2023
    Review
  14. Testosterone replacement therapy in the era of telemedicine.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Moises Rodriguez SocarrásInstituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA), Madrid, Spain.
Stacy LoebDepartment of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA.
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Maria J RibalUro-oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jarka BloembergEuropean Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
James CattoAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
James N'DowAcademic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Hendrik Van PoppelDepartment of Urology, Katholieke University, Leuven, Belgium.
Juan Gómez RivasDepartment of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party (ESUT-YAU), European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands. Electronic address: juangomezr@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextTelemedicine provides remote clinical support using technological tools. It may facilitate health care delivery while reducing unnecessary visits to the clinic. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has caused an abrupt change in our daily urological practice, converting many of us to be reliant on telehealth.

objectiveTo provide practical recommendations for effective use of technological tools in telemedicine. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A Medline-based and gray literature search was conducted through April 2020. We selected the most relevant articles related to "telemedicine" and "smart working" that could provide important information. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Telemedicine refers to the use of electronic information and telecommunications tools to provide remote clinical health care support. Smart working is a model of work that uses new or existing technologies to improve performance. Telemedicine is becoming a useful invaluable tool during and even beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. It is time for us to formalize the place of telemedicine in routine urological practice, and it is our responsibility to adapt and learn about all the tools and possible strategies for their optimal implementation during the pandemic to ensure that the quality of care received by patients and the outcomes of patients and their families are of the highest standard.

conclusionsTelemedicine facilitates specialized urological clinical support at a distance, solves problems of limitations in mobility, reduces unnecessary visits to clinics, and is useful for reducing the risk of viral transmission in the current COVID-19 outbreak. Furthermore, both personal and societal considerations may favor continued use of telemedicine, even beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENT SUMMARY: Telemedicine in urology offers specialized remote clinical support to patients, similar to face-to-face visits. It is very useful for reducing unnecessary visits to the clinic, as well as reducing the risk of contagion in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineUrologic DiseasesAppointments and SchedulesElectronic Health RecordsHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPrivacySARS-CoV-2TriageUrologyCOVID-19OutbreakSmart workSocial mediaTelehealthTelemedicineTeleworkVideo visit

Identifiers

PMID32654801
PMCPMC7347487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.