Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32654646›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Adaptive zones shape the magnitude of premating reproductive isolation in

Moritz Muschick, Víctor Soria-Carrasco, Jeffrey L Feder, Zach Gompert, Patrik Nosil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complex evolutionary processes maintain an ancient chromosomal inversion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards the completion of speciation: the evolution of reproductive isolation beyond the first barriers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Adaptive zones shape the magnitude of premating reproductive isolation inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moritz MuschickDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Víctor Soria-CarrascoDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Jeffrey L FederDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Zach GompertDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Patrik NosilDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simpson's fossil-record inspired model of 'adaptive zones' proposes that evolution is dominated by small fluctuations within adaptive zones, occasionally punctuated by larger shifts between zones. This model can help explain why the process of population divergence often results in weak or moderate reproductive isolation (RI), rather than strong RI and distinct species. Applied to the speciation process, the adaptive zones hypothesis makes two inter-related predictions: (i) large shifts between zones are relatively rare, (ii) when large shifts do occur they generate stronger RI than shifts within zones. Here, we use ecological, phylogenetic and behavioural data to test these predictions in

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalReproductive IsolationSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFood ChainInsectaMagnoliopsidaTracheophytahost preferencephylogeneticsreproductive isolationspeciationTimema stick insects

Identifiers

PMID32654646
PMCPMC7423284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.