Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32654079›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2020

Breaks of macrosynteny and collinearity among moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia), cowpea (V. unguiculata), and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).

Ana Rafaela da S Oliveira, Lívia do Vale Martins, Fernanda de O Bustamante, María Muñoz-Amatriaín, Timothy Close, Antônio F da Costa, Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand, Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Moth bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  6. Oligo-FISH barcode in beans: a new chromosome identification system.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiple and independent rearrangements revealed by comparative cytogenetic mapping in the dysploid Leptostachyus group (Phaseolus L., Leguminosae).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Rafaela da S OliveiraDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-0185
Lívia do Vale MartinsDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4645-9055
Fernanda de O BustamanteDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2826-5217
María Muñoz-AmatriaínDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4476-1691
Timothy CloseDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9759-3775
Antônio F da CostaInstituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9866-3504
Ana Maria Benko-IsepponDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0575-3197
Andrea Pedrosa-HarandDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5213-4770
Ana Christina Brasileiro-VidalDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. brasileirovidal.ac@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9704-5509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative cytogenetic mapping is a powerful approach to gain insights into genome organization of orphan crops, lacking a whole sequenced genome. To investigate the cytogenomic evolution of important Vigna and Phaseolus beans, we built a BAC-FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization of bacterial artificial chromosome) map of Vigna aconitifolia (Vac, subgenus Ceratotropis), species with no sequenced genome, and compared with V. unguiculata (Vu, subgenus Vigna) and Phaseolus vulgaris (Pv) maps. Seventeen Pv BACs, eight Vu BACs, and 5S and 35S rDNA probes were hybridized in situ on the 11 Vac chromosome pairs. Five Vac chromosomes (Vac6, Vac7, Vac9, Vac10, and Vac11) showed conserved macrosynteny and collinearity between V. unguiculata and P. vulgaris. On the other hand, we observed collinearity breaks, identified by pericentric inversions involving Vac2 (Vu2), Vac4 (Vu4), and Vac3 (Pv3). We also detected macrosynteny breaks of translocation type involving chromosomes 1 and 8 of V. aconitifolia and P. vulgaris; 2 and 3 of V. aconitifolia and P. vulgaris; and 1 and 5 of V. aconitifolia and V. unguiculata. Considering our data and previous BAC-FISH studies, six chromosomes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8) are involved in major karyotype divergences between genera and five (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) between Vigna subgenera, including mechanisms such as duplications, inversions, and translocations. Macrosynteny breaks between Vigna and Phaseolus suggest that the major chromosomal rearrangements have occurred within the Vigna clade. Our cytogenomic comparisons bring new light on the degree of shared macrosynteny and mechanisms of karyotype diversification during Vigna and Phaseolus evolution.

Indexed as

CytogeneticsGenomicsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, PlantGenome, PlantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeKaryotypingPhaseolusVignaBAC-FISHbeanschromosome rearrangementskaryotype evolutionPhaseolineae subtribesynteny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.