Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32654023›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Facial nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba, Ekhiñe Larruscain-Sarasola, Jérome Rene Lechien, Francois Mouawad, Christian Calvo-Henriquez, Evelyne Siga Diom, Adonis Ramirez, Tareck Ayad

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Navigating the Labyrinth: A Rare Encounter with an Exceptionally Long Facial Nerve Trunk in Total Parotidectomy: A Case Report.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of Surgeon's Experience and Tumor's Nature in the Use of Intraoperative Facial Nerve Monitoring in Superficial Parotidectomy. Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  18. Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve predicts postoperative facial palsy in parotid surgery: a prospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Carlos Miguel Chiesa-EstombaOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Calle Doctor Begiristain, #1. CP. 20014, San Sebastian-Donostia, Guipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain. chiesaestomba86@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-9464
Ekhiñe Larruscain-SarasolaOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Calle Doctor Begiristain, #1. CP. 20014, San Sebastian-Donostia, Guipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain.
Jérome Rene LechienDepartment of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Francois MouawadDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France.
Christian Calvo-HenriquezDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Evelyne Siga DiomENT and Head and Neck Departement, CHU de La Paix, UFR Santé de l'Université Assane Seck, Ziguinchor, Sénégal.
Adonis RamirezHead and Neck Surgery, Clinica Medilaser Neiva, Neiva, Colombia.
Tareck AyadDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Center Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRHospital Universitario de Neiva · COUniversity of Mons · BEZiguinchor University · SN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFacial nerve injury remains the most severe complication of parotid gland surgery. However, the use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) during parotid gland surgery among Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons continues to be a matter of debate. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted including articles from 1970 to 2019 to try to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in preventing immediate and permanent postoperative facial nerve weakness in patients undergoing primary parotidectomy. Acceptable studies included controlled series that evaluated facial nerve function following primary parotidectomy with or without intraoperative facial nerve monitoring.

resultsTen articles met inclusion criteria, with a total of 1069 patients included in the final meta-analysis. The incidence of immediate and permanent postoperative weakness following parotidectomy was significantly lower in the IFNM group compared to the unmonitored group (23.4% vs. 38.4%; p = 0.001) and (5.7% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.001) when all studies were included. However, when we analyze just prospective data, we are not able to find any significant difference.

conclusionOur study suggests that IFNM may decrease the risk of immediate post-operative and permanent facial nerve weakness in primary parotid gland surgery. However, due to the low evidence level, additional prospective-randomized trials are needed to determine if these results can be translated into improved surgical safety and improved patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Facial Nerve InjuriesFacial ParalysisParotid NeoplasmsFacial NerveHumansParotid GlandPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesFacial nerve monitorFacial nerve weaknessIntraoperative facial nerve monitoringParotidectomyParotid surgery

Identifiers

PMID32654023
OpenAlexW3041028399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.