ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Motion correction and noise removing in lung diffusion-weighted MRI using low-rank decomposition.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic resonance radiomic feature performance in pulmonary nodule classification and impact of segmentation variability on radiomics.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) has shown a promising value in lung lesion detection, diagnosis, differentiation, and staging. However, the respiratory and cardiac motion, blood flow, and lung hysteresis may contribute to the blurring, resulting in unclear lung images. The image blurring could adversely affect diagnosis performance. The purpose of this study is to reduce the DWI blurring and assess its positive effect on diagnosis. The retrospective study includes 71 patients. In this paper, a motion correction and noise removal method using low-rank decomposition is proposed, which can reduce the DWI blurring by exploit the spatiotemporal continuity sequences. The deblurring performances are evaluated by qualitative and quantitative assessment, and the performance of diagnosis of lung cancer is measured by area under curve (AUC). In the view of the qualitative assessment, the deformation of the lung mass is reduced, and the blurring of the lung tumor edge is alleviated. Noise in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map is greatly reduced. For quantitative assessment, mutual information (MI) and Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson-Coff) are 1.30 and 0.82 before the decomposition and 1.40 and 0.85 after the decomposition. Both the difference in MI and Pearson-Coff are statistically significant (p < 0.05). For the positive effect of deblurring on diagnosis of lung cancer, the AUC was improved from 0.731 to 0.841 using three-fold cross validation. We conclude that the low-rank matrix decomposition method is promising in reducing the errors in DWI lung images caused by noise and artifacts and improving diagnostics. Further investigations are warranted to understand the full utilities of the low-rank decomposition on lung DWI images. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.