ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2020
Bone healing at collagenated bicortically installed implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Critical-sized marginal defects around implants treated with xenografts in rabbits.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Collagen-Based Osteogenic Nanocoating of Microrough Titanium Surfaces.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo study the healing at collagenated bicortically installed implants.
methodsTwenty albino New Zealand rabbits were used for implant installation. Two implants with a double acid etched surface, coated with a collagen type I or left uncoated, were installed bicortically in the metaphysis and in the diaphysis of each tibia. Ten rabbits were euthanized after 2 weeks and ten after 6 weeks after installation. Ground sections were prepared for histological analyses that were performed both in the cortical layers and in the marrow regions.
resultsAfter 2 weeks of healing, highest amounts of new bone were found at the collagenated implants (43.2 ± 6.0%) compared to the standard implants (33.9 ± 6.1%; p = 0.022). After 6 weeks of healing, similar percentages of new bone were observed, being 51.8 ± 7.3% and 50.9 ± 9.6% (p = 0.678) for the standard and collagenated surfaces, respectively.
conclusionsA coated surface with collagen type I promoted bone apposition in the earliest periods of healing. However, the effect vanished over time so that similar results were obtained after 6 weeks of healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.