Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2020
Comparison of two-flap palatoplasty plus intravelar veloplasty technique with and without double-layer Z-plasty on the soft palate length in children with cleft palate.
Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVelopharyngeal failure occurs as a result of a nasopharyngeal gap following inadequate velopharyngeal closure for structural or functional cause. We aimed to compare the soft palate length in two-flap palatoplasty with intravelar veloplasty (IVV) and two-flap palatoplasty with IVV plus double-layer Z-plasty combination in patients with cleft palate.
methodsThis clinical trial was conducted on infants aged 9 to 12 months with cleft palate in two groups. The method of two-flap palatoplasty with IVV technique and two-flap palatoplasty with IVV plus double-layer Z-plasty was compared in terms of soft palate length which was measured during operation and short-term complications.
resultsThis study was conducted on 62 infants including 30 patients in two-flap palatoplasty with IVV group and 32 patients in two-flap palatoplasty with IVV plus double-layer Z-plasty group. The soft palate length in two-flap palatoplasty and IVV with and without Z-plasty groups before surgery was 17.56 ± 2.05 and 17.68 ± 1.88 mm, respectively (P = 0.561). After surgery, the soft palate length was significantly higher in two-flap palatoplasty with IVV plus Z-plasty group (22.43 ± 2.73 mm vs. 20.56 ± 2.42 mm) (P = 0.032).
conclusionThe two-flap palatoplasty with IVV plus Z-plasty technique is a suitable method for increasing the palatal length in infants with cleft palate. On the other hand, the addition of Z-plasty method could increase the length of the palate. Moreover, the complications are very low and further trials for development of this method on patients with cleft palate are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): IRCT2017032423559N11.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.