ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020
Hippocampal sclerosis without visually detectable hippocampal MRI abnormalities: automated subfield volumetric analysis.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interhemispheric asymmetrical change in gray matter volume in patients with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to investigate hippocampal subfield volumes in patients with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) without visually detectable MRI abnormalities and to determine the diagnostic accuracy using hippocampal subfield volumes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe examined 46 patients with unilateral HS who had a histopathological diagnosis, and 54 controls. The patients were divided into two groups; visually detectable HS (n = 26) and undetectable HS (n = 20) on MRI. The volumes of hippocampal subfield using FreeSurfer were compared among the three groups. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated as the AUC of ROC using cutoff values for each individual subfield.
resultsCompared with the controls, visually detectable HS showed significantly reduced volumes of all the hippocampal subfields and entire hippocampus, whereas visually undetectable HS showed significant atrophy only in the CA3 and hippocampus-amygdala-transition-area. To diagnose visually undetectable HS, the CA3 volumes had AUC of 0.719, which was higher than AUC of 0.614 based on the entire hippocampal volumes.
conclusionVisually undetectable HS demonstrated volume reductions in the CA3. Further, the CA3 volumes was more useful to diagnose visually undetectable HS compared with the entire hippocampal volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.