Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32653930›Full record

ReviewNutrition reviews2021

Dietary recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Christianne de Faria Coelho-Ravagnani, Flavia Campos Corgosinho, Fabiane La Flor Ziegler Sanches, Carla Marques Maia Prado, Alessandro Laviano, João Felipe Mota

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05220631 (A Technological Intervention to Improve Nutrition Among Older Adult Congregate Meal Participants During COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
40.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05220631 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Technological Intervention to Improve Nutrition Among Older Adult Congregate Meal Participants During COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas at San AntonioRan2022 to 2026Enrolled369ConditionsNutrition Poor, Physical Inactivity, Social IsolationArmsTechnology intervention, Digital Nutrition Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christianne de Faria Coelho-RavagnaniGraduate Program in Movement Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Flavia Campos CorgosinhoGraduate Program in Movement Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Fabiane La Flor Ziegler SanchesGraduate Program in Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Food and Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Carla Marques Maia PradoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alessandro LavianoDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
João Felipe MotaClinical and Sports Nutrition Research Laboratory (Labince), School of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal nutrition can improve well-being and might mitigate the risk and morbidity associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This review summarizes nutritional guidelines to support dietary counseling provided by dietitians and health-related professionals. The majority of documents encouraged the consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grain foods. Thirty-one percent of the guidelines highlighted the importance of minerals and vitamins such as zinc and vitamins C, A, and D to maintain a well-functioning immune system. Dietary supplementation has not been linked to COVID-19 prevention. However, supplementation with vitamins C and D, as well as with zinc and selenium, was highlighted as potentially beneficial for individuals with, or at risk of, respiratory viral infections or for those in whom nutrient deficiency is detected. There was no convincing evidence that food or food packaging is associated with the transmission of COVID-19, but good hygiene practices for handling and preparing foods were recommended. No changes to breastfeeding recommendations have been made, even in women diagnosed with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19DietNutrition PolicyVitaminsHumansNutritional StatusPandemicsVitaminsbreastfeedingCOVID-19foodhygienesupplementation

Identifiers

PMID32653930
PMCPMC7454801
OpenAlexW3042048038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.