Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32653836›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020

Comparison of complications according to incision types in nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Soeun Park, Changik Yoon, Soong June Bae, Chihwan Cha, Dooreh Kim, Janghee Lee, Sung Gwe Ahn, Tai Suk Roh, Young Seok Kim, Joon Jeong

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complications, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes of nipple-sparingTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soeun ParkDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Surgery, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University, Goyang, South Korea.
Changik YoonDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Soong June BaeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chihwan ChaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dooreh KimDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Janghee LeeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Gwe AhnDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Tai Suk RohDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Young Seok KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joon JeongDepartment of Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: gsjjoon@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), followed by immediate reconstruction (IR) of the breast, has become a preferred surgical procedure with good cosmesis results and patient satisfaction. However, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) ischemia and necrosis remain major problems after NSM and IR.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent NSM and IR at Gangnam Severance Hospital from January 2009 to June 2018. We compared the patient characteristics and complication rate among three different incisions (inframammary fold [IMF], radial, periareolar). Additionally, we identified the risk factors of NAC necrosis.

resultsData from 290 eligible breasts in 275 patients were analyzed. Patients with IMF incision had relatively lower breast weights. The overall complication rate was the highest with periareolar incision and the lowest with IMF incision (42.6% vs. 18.8%, p < 0.001). The rate of NAC ischemia or necrosis was significantly different among the three incisions (9.7%, 17.0%, and 31.1% in IMF, radial, and periareolar, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, surgical treatments were more frequently needed in patients with periareolar incision. Periareolar incision, short distance from the tumor to the nipple base, and large breast weight were independent risk factors of NAC ischemia or necrosis in multivariable analysis.

conclusionsCompared with IMF incision, periareolar incision was associated with higher incidences of surgical complications and NAC necrosis. Careful consideration is needed when planning NSM in patients with a large breast volume or a tumor close to the nipple.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMammaplastyMastectomy, SegmentalMastectomy, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNipplesPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesComplicationIncisionNipple-areolar complex necrosisNipple-sparing mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID32653836
PMCPMC7375566
OpenAlexW3040517425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.