Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32653776›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2020

The bidirectional nature of microbiome-epithelial cell interactions.

Angel G Solis, Max Klapholz, Jingru Zhao, Maayan Levy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Milk-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and microRNAs: Potential Modulators of Intestinal Homeostasis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Engineered Tissue Models to Decode Host-Microbiota Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Effect ofmSystems · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angel G SolisDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Max KlapholzDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jingru ZhaoDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Maayan LevyDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: maayanle@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
University of Pennsylvania Postdoctoral Opportunities in Research and TeachingK12GM081259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Janis K. Burkhardt · 2007 to 2026
$20.1M
Post-biotic interventions to ameliorate age-related inflammationDP2AG067511 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEVY, MAAYAN · 2019 to 2019
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS DP2 AG067511NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM081259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biogeography of the mammalian intestine is remarkable in that a vast microbial consortium exists inside the organism, surrounded by intestinal epithelial cells. The microbiome and the intestinal epithelium have developed a complex network of interactions that maintain intestinal homeostasis. We now recognize that functions of the epithelium are compartmentalized in specific intestinal epithelial cell subtypes. Furthermore, we are beginning to understand the ways in which microbes and their metabolic products impact the specific epithelial subsets. Here, we survey the mechanisms utilized by the microbiome to regulate intestinal epithelial function, and inversely, how different epithelial cell subtypes cooperate in regulating the microbiome.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsEpithelial CellsHomeostasisHumansIntestinal Mucosa

Identifiers

PMID32653776
PMCPMC7744412
OpenAlexW3041255506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.