Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32653391›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2020

Love in the Time of COVID-19: Sexual Function and Quality of Life Analysis During the Social Distancing Measures in a Group of Italian Reproductive-Age Women.

Michele Carlo Schiavi, Vincenzo Spina, Marzio Angelo Zullo, Vanessa Colagiovanni, Paolo Luffarelli, Rocco Rago, Pierluigi Palazzetti

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SARS-CoV-2 infection and female reproductive health: A narrative review.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michele Carlo SchiaviDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Department of Gynecological and Obstetrics, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: michelecarlo.schiavi@gmail.com.
Vincenzo SpinaDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Marzio Angelo ZulloDepartment of Surgery-Week Surgery, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy.
Vanessa ColagiovanniDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo LuffarelliDepartment of Surgery-Week Surgery, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy.
Rocco RagoPhysiopathology of Reproduction and Andrology Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Pierluigi PalazzettiDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Ospedale Sandro Pertini · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITPhysiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements · FRSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe beginning of 2020 was characterized by the COVID-19 pandemic. The world governments have adopted restrictive measures to reduce the spread of infection. These measures could affect the sexual function and quality of life of women living with their partner.

aimThe aim is to assess the impact of the social distancing measures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual function and quality of life of noninfected reproductive-age women, living with their sexual partner.

methodsObservational analysis on sexually active women, living with their partner, and without COVID-19 infection was performed. The population previously answered FSFI, FSDS, and SF-36 questionnaires. 4 weeks after the introduction of the restrictive measures, these women were invited to complete the same questionnaires by e-mail for an evaluation during the COVID-19 outbreak.

main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was the assessment of the women's sex function change during the social restriction period, by analyzing the FSFI and FSDS questionnaires. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of the impact on the quality of life calculated by the SF-36 questionnaire.

results89 patients were considered. The median age was 39 (28-50) years. Mean sexual intercourses/month decreased from 6.3 ± 1.9 to 2.3 ± 1.8, mean difference: -3.9 ± 1.2. FSFI decreased significantly (29.2 ± 4.2 vs 19.2 ± 3.3, mean difference: -9.7 ± 2.6) and FSDS increased significantly (9.3 ± 5.5 vs 20.1 ± 5.2, mean difference: 10.8 ± 3.4). The SF-36 showed a significant change from 82.2 ± 10.2 to 64.2 ± 11.8 4 weeks after the introduction of the restrictive measures; mean difference: -17.8 ± 6.7. The univariable analysis identified working outside the home, university educational level, and parity ≥1 as predictive factors of lower FSFI. In multivariable analysis, working outside the home and combination of working outside the home + university educational level + parity ≥1 were the independent factors of a lower FSFI. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: The negative impact of the COVID-19 epidemic period on sexual function and quality of life in women shows how acute stress might affect the psychological state. Thus, psychological or sexual support could be useful. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first that analyzes the change in sexual activity in women during the COVID-19 outbreak period. The limitations were the low number of the analyzed participants, psychological tests were not included, and no data were collected on masturbation, self-heroism, solitary, and nonpenetrative sex.

conclusionThe COVID-19 epidemic and the restrictive social distancing measures have negatively influenced the sexual function and quality of life in not-infected reproductive-age women who live with their sexual partners. Schiavi MC, Spina V, Zullo MA, et al. Love in the Time of COVID-19: Sexual Function and Quality of Life Analysis During the Social Distancing Measures in a Group of Italian Reproductive-Age Women. J Sex Med 2020;17:1407-1413.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalAdultCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPhysical DistancingPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sexual BehaviorCoronavirusCOVID-19FSFIQuality of LifeSexual Function

Identifiers

PMID32653391
PMCPMC7342024
OpenAlexW3040831298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.