Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32653265›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice2020

Feeding Cats for Optimal Mental and Behavioral Well-Being.

Mikel Delgado, Leticia M S Dantas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mikel DelgadoDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, 2108 Tupper Hall, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: mmdelgado@ucdavis.edu.
Leticia M S DantasBehavioral Medicine Service, Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Georgia Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Georgia, 501 D.W. Brooks Dr., Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
UC Davis CTSC TL1 Administrative Supplement to Recognize Excellence in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility MentorshipTL1TR001861 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MEDICI, VALENTINA · 2016 to 2025
$4.7M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001861NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we review cats' feeding behaviors, and discuss ways of feeding cats that promote physical and mental/behavioral health, while providing cats with choices that allow expression of preferences. We address the management of several feeding issues that cat owners may face, such as obesity, pickiness, begging for food, and feeding in multi-cat households. Food puzzles are one way to provide environmental enrichment for cats, and food can be used in multiple ways for behavior modification in the clinical setting, including counterconditioning and differential reinforcement of alternative behaviors.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBehavior, AnimalNutritional RequirementsAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCatsDomestic catsFeeding behaviorFood puzzlesForagingMental healthPredation

Identifiers

PMID32653265
PMCPMC7415653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.