Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32653029›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2020

Study design to evaluate a group-based therapy for support persons of adults on buprenorphine/naloxone.

Karen Chan Osilla, Kirsten Becker, Liisa Ecola, Brian Hurley, Jennifer K Manuel, Allison Ober, Susan M Paddock, Katherine E Watkins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04239235 (Comparative Effectiveness of Significant Other-Enhanced OBOT in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04239235 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effectiveness of Significant Other-Enhanced OBOT in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled439ConditionsOpioid AddictionArmsCRAFT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karen Chan OsillaRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA. karenc@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-5833
Kirsten BeckerRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA.
Liisa EcolaRAND Corporation, 1100 South Hayes Street, VA, 22202, Arlington, USA.
Brian HurleyLA County Department of Health Services, UCLA Department of Family Medicine, 10780 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 105, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA.
Jennifer K ManuelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Allison OberRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA.
Susan M PaddockNORC at the University of Chicago, 55 East Monroe St, 31st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60603, USA.
Katherine E WatkinsRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA.
RAND Corporation · USLos Angeles County Department of Health Services · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid use disorders (OUDs) have devastating effects on individuals, families, and communities. While medication treatments for OUD save lives and are increasingly utilized, rates of treatment dropout are very high. In addition, most existing medication treatments for OUD may often neglect the impact of untreated OUD on relationships and ignore the potential role support persons (SPs) could have on encouraging long-term recovery, which can also impact patient treatment retention. METHODS/

designThe current study adapts Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) for use with SPs (family member, spouse or friend) of patients using buprenorphine/naloxone (buprenorphine) in an outpatient community clinic setting. The study will evaluate whether the adapted intervention, also known as integrating support persons into recovery (INSPIRE), is effective in increasing patient retention on buprenorphine when compared to usual care. We will utilize a two-group randomized design where patients starting or restarting buprenorphine will be screened for support person status and recruited with their support person if eligible. Support persons will be randomly assigned to the INSPIRE intervention, which will consist of 10 rolling group sessions led by two facilitators. Patients and SPs will each be assessed at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 12 months post-baseline. Patient electronic medical record data will be collected at six and 12 months post-baseline. We will examine mechanisms of intervention effectiveness and also conduct pre/post-implementation surveys with clinic staff to assess issues that would affect sustainability. DISCUSSION: Incorporating the patient's support system may be an important way to improve treatment retention in medication treatments for OUD. If SPs can serve to support patient retention, this study would significantly advance work to help support the delivery of effective treatments that prevent the devastating consequences associated with OUD. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04239235. Registered 27 January 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04239235 .

Indexed as

Psychotherapy, GroupSocial SupportAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationCaliforniaCommunity Health CentersFamilyFemaleHumansOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationBuprenorphineCRAFTFamilyMedication assisted treatmentOpioid use disorders

Identifiers

PMID32653029
PMCPMC7353769
OpenAlexW3040911991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.