Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32653000›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products (SCFP) stabilize the ruminal microbiota of lactating dairy cows during periods of a depressed rumen pH.

Hein M Tun, Shucong Li, Ilkyu Yoon, Sarah J Meale, Paula A Azevedo, Ehsan Khafipour, Jan C Plaizier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Effects of aAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects ofTranslational animal science · 2025
    Article
  13. The Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Postbiotics fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Hein M TunDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Shucong LiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Ilkyu YoonDiamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA, USA.
Sarah J MealeSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University of Queensland Gatton campus, Gatton, Australia.
Paula A AzevedoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Ehsan KhafipourDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. Ehsan_Khafipour@diamondv.com.
Jan C PlaizierDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. plaizier@umanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9004-7969
University of Manitoba · CADiamond V (United States) · USHKU-Pasteur Research Pole · HKThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Agri-Food Research and Development Initiative ARDI10-1053NSERC 238454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products (SCFP) on rumen microbiota were determined in vitro and in vivo under a high and a depressed pH. The in vitro trial determined the effects of Original XPC and NutriTek (Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA) at doses of 1.67 and 2.33 g/L, respectively, on the abundances of rumen bacteria under a high pH (> 6.3) and a depressed pH (5.8-6.0) using quantitative PCR (qPCR). In the in vivo trial eight rumen-cannulated lactating dairy cows were used in a cross-over design. Cows were randomly assigned to SCFP treatments (Original XPC, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA) or control (No SCFP) before two 5-week experimental periods. During the second period, SCFP treatments were reversed. Cows on the SCFP treatment were supplemented with 14 g/d of SCFP and 126 g/d of ground corn. Other cows received 140 g/d ground corn. During the first 4 wk. of each period, cows received a basal diet containing 153 g/kg of starch. During week 5 of both periods, the rumen pH was depressed by a SARA challenge. This included replacing 208 g/kg of the basal diet with pellets of ground wheat and barley, resulting in a diet that contained 222 g/kg DM of starch. Microbial communities in rumen liquid digesta were examined by pyrosequencing, qPCR, and shotgun metagenomics.

resultsDuring the in vitro experiment, XPC and NutriTek increased the relative abundances of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Fibrobacter succinogenes determined at both the high and the depressed pH, with NutriTek having the largest effect. The relative abundances of Prevotella brevis, R. flavefaciens, ciliate protozoa, and Bifidobacterium spp. were increased by XPC in vivo. Adverse impacts of the in vivo SARA challenge included reductions of the richness and diversity of the rumen microbial community, the abundances of Bacteroidetes and ciliate protozoa in the rumen as determined by pyrosequencing, and the predicted functionality of rumen microbiota as determined by shotgun metagenomics. These reductions were attenuated by XPC supplementation.

conclusionsThe negative effects of grain-based SARA challenges on the composition and predicted functionality of rumen microbiota are attenuated by supplementation with SCFP.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeAcidosisAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCiliophoraDietFemaleFermentationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLactationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenStomach DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32653000
PMCPMC7353776
OpenAlexW3041766533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.