Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32652994›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

An observational analysis of the impact of indoor residual spraying in Northern, Upper East, and Upper West Regions of Ghana: 2014 through 2017.

Christelle Gogue, Joseph Wagman, Kenzie Tynuv, Andrew Saibu, Yemane Yihdego, Keziah Malm, Wahjib Mohamed, Welbeck Akplu, Titus Tagoe, Anthony Ofosu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Longitudinal analysis of the prevalence of minormedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christelle GoguePATH, Washington, DC, USA. cgogue@path.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6451
Joseph WagmanPATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Kenzie TynuvPATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrew SaibuAbt Associates NgenIRS Project, Accra, Ghana.
Yemane YihdegoAbt Associates Africa Indoor Residual Spraying Program, Accra, Ghana.
Keziah MalmNational Malaria Control Programme, Accra, Ghana.
Wahjib MohamedNational Malaria Control Programme, Accra, Ghana.
Welbeck AkpluGhana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Titus TagoeGhana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Anthony OfosuGhana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Ignatius WilliamsAngloGold Ashanti Malaria Control Limited, Accra, Ghana.
Samuel AsieduAngloGold Ashanti Malaria Control Limited, Accra, Ghana.
Jason RichardsonIVCC, Washington, DC, USA.
Christen FornadelIVCC, Washington, DC, USA.
Laurence SlutskerPATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Molly RobertsonPATH, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGhana has been implementing the indoor residual spraying (IRS) of insecticides since 2006, focusing operations in the north. Insecticide resistance concerns prompted a switch from pyrethroids to organophosphates, beginning gradually in 2011 and switching fully to the micro-encapsulated formulation of pirimiphosmethyl (PM CS), Actellic

methodsTo assess the epidemiological impact of Ghana's IRS programmatic activities, a retrospective, observational analysis using routine epidemiological data was conducted to compare malaria incidence rates from IRS and non-IRS districts in Northern, Upper East, and Upper West Regions. Routine epidemiological data consisted of passive malaria case surveillance data reported in the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2); with cases representing patients with suspected malaria who had sought care in the public health system and had received a confirmatory diagnosis with a positive malaria RDT result. Final routine data were extracted in September 2018. All districts that had received IRS were included in the analysis and compared to all non-IRS districts within the same region. In the Northern Region, only PMI districts were included in the analysis, as they had similar historical data.

resultsDistrict-level analysis from Northern Region from 2015 to 2017 of the aggregate malaria incidence reported from IRS districts relative to non-IRS comparator districts showed 39%, 26%, and 58% fewer confirmed malaria cases reported from IRS districts in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. This translates to approximately 257,000 fewer cases than expected over the three years. In Upper East Region, the effect on reported malaria cases of withdrawing IRS from the region was striking; after spray operations were suspended in 2015, incidence increased an average of 485% per district (95% confidence interval: 330% to 640%) compared to 2014.

conclusionsThe current observational analysis results are in line with the entomological studies in demonstrating the positive contribution of IRS with a 3GIRS product to malaria control programmes in northern Ghana and the value of using routine surveillance and implementation data to rapidly assess the impact of vector control interventions in operational settings, even in complex implementation environments.

Indexed as

GhanaHumansIncidenceInsecticidesMalariaMosquito ControlRetrospective StudiesInsecticides3GIRSActellicIndoor residual sprayingIRSMalariaPirimiphosmethylPM CSThird-generation IRSVector control

Identifiers

PMID32652994
PMCPMC7353711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.