Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32652886›Full record

Observational studyClinical and translational science2020

Fasting Status and Circadian Variation Must be Considered When Performing AUC-based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Marte Theie Gustavsen, Karsten Midtvedt, Ida Robertsen, Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Jean Debord, Rolf Anton Klaasen, Nils Tore Vethe, Stein Bergan, Anders Åsberg

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Tacrolimus Dose Requirement inTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analyses of AUCJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marte Theie GustavsenDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Karsten MidtvedtDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ida RobertsenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jean-Baptiste WoillardDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.
Jean DebordDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.
Rolf Anton KlaasenDepartment of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Nils Tore VetheDepartment of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Stein BerganDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anders ÅsbergDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOInserm · FRUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is mandatory for the immunosuppressive drug tacrolimus (Tac). For clinical applicability, TDM is performed using morning trough concentrations. With recent developments making tacrolimus concentration determination possible in capillary microsamples and Bayesian estimator predicted area under the concentration curve (AUC), AUC-guided TDM may now be clinically applicable. Tac circadian variation has, however, been reported, with lower systemic exposure following the evening dose. The aim of the present study was to investigate tacrolimus pharmacokinetic (PK) after morning and evening administrations of twice-daily tacrolimus in a real-life setting without restrictions regarding food and concomitant drug timing. Two 12 hour tacrolimus investigations were performed; after the morning dose and the following evening dose, respectively, in 31 renal transplant recipients early after transplantation both in a fasting-state and under real-life nonfasting conditions (14 patients repeated the investigation). We observed circadian variation under fasting-conditions: 45% higher peak-concentration and 20% higher AUC following the morning dose. In the real-life nonfasting setting, the PK-profiles were flat but comparable after the morning and evening doses, showing slower absorption rate and lower AUC compared with the fasting-state. Limited sampling strategies using concentrations at 0, 1, and 3 hours predicted AUC after fasting morning administration, and samples obtained at 1, 3, and 6 hours predicted AUC for the other conditions (evening and real-life nonfasting). In conclusion, circadian variation of tacrolimus is present when performed in patients who are in the fasting-state, whereas flatter PK-profiles and no circadian variation was present in a real-life, nonfasting setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveCircadian RhythmDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringFastingFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalProspective StudiesImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID32652886
PMCPMC7719361
OpenAlexW3042175763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.