Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32652511›Full record

ReviewConsciousness and cognition2020

Dream engineering: Simulating worlds through sensory stimulation.

Michelle Carr, Adam Haar, Judith Amores, Pedro Lopes, Guillermo Bernal, Tomás Vega, Oscar Rosello, Abhinandan Jain, Pattie Maes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Consciousness and cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Future of Parasomnias.Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. New strategies for the cognitive science of dreaming.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dreaming outside the Box: Evidence for Memory Abstraction in REM Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Predictive coding, multisensory integration, and attentional control: A multicomponent framework for lucid dreaming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. The vision of dreams: from ontogeny to dream engineering in blindness.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dormio: A targeted dream incubation device.Consciousness and cognition · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle CarrSleep & Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: Michelle_Carr@URMC.Rochester.edu.
Adam HaarMIT Media Lab, MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
Judith AmoresMIT Media Lab, MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
Pedro LopesUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Guillermo BernalMIT Media Lab, MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
Tomás VegaMIT Media Lab, MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
Oscar RoselloMIT Media Lab, MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
Abhinandan JainMIT Media Lab, MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
Pattie MaesMIT Media Lab, MIT, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Rochester Partnership to Advance Research and Academic Careers in Deaf ScholarsK12GM106997 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BUCKLEY, GERARD J., DEWHURST, STEPHEN · 2015 to 2024
$6.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM106997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explore the application of a wide range of sensory stimulation technologies to the area of sleep and dream engineering. We begin by emphasizing the causal role of the body in dream generation, and describe a circuitry between the sleeping body and the dreaming mind. We suggest that nearly any sensory stimuli has potential for modulating experience in sleep. Considering other areas that might afford tools for engineering sensory content in simulated worlds, we turn to Virtual Reality (VR). We outline a collection of relevant VR technologies, including devices engineered to stimulate haptic, temperature, vestibular, olfactory, and auditory sensations. We believe these technologies, which have been developed for high mobility and low cost, can be translated to the field of dream engineering. We close by discussing possible future directions in this field and the ethics of a world in which targeted dream direction and sleep manipulation are feasible.

Indexed as

Physical StimulationDreamsHumansSensationSleep, REMDreamingHaptic devicesHuman Computer interactionSimulationSleepVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32652511
PMCPMC7415562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.