Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32652499›Full record

ArticleInternational immunopharmacology2020

Use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection from Full Blood Counts in a population.

Abhirup Banerjee, Surajit Ray, Bart Vorselaars, Joanne Kitson, Michail Mamalakis, Simonne Weeks, Mark Baker, Louise S Mackenzie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International immunopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Plausible mechanism of drug resistance and side-effects of COVID-19 therapeutics: a bottleneck for its eradication.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Abhirup BanerjeeDepartment of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK. Electronic address: abhirup.banerjee@cardiov.ox.ac.uk.
Surajit RaySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK. Electronic address: Surajit.Ray@glasgow.ac.uk.
Bart VorselaarsSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK. Electronic address: bvorselaars@lincoln.ac.uk.
Joanne KitsonSchool of Computer Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Engineering Maths, University of Bristol, Merchant Venturers Building, Woodland Rd, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1UB, UK.
Michail MamalakisSchool of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, 211 Portobello, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK.
Simonne WeeksSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK.
Mark BakerHypatia Solutions Ltd, Impact Hub King's Cross, 34b York Way, King's Cross, London, XGL N1, UK.
Louise S MackenzieSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK. Electronic address: l.mackenzie2@brighton.ac.uk.
University of Brighton · GBKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Lincoln · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since December 2019 the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has been identified as the cause of the pandemic COVID-19. Early symptoms overlap with other common conditions such as common cold and Influenza, making early screening and diagnosis are crucial goals for health practitioners. The aim of the study was to use machine learning (ML), an artificial neural network (ANN) and a simple statistical test to identify SARS-CoV-2 positive patients from full blood counts without knowledge of symptoms or history of the individuals. The dataset included in the analysis and training contains anonymized full blood counts results from patients seen at the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, at São Paulo, Brazil, and who had samples collected to perform the SARS-CoV-2 rt-PCR test during a visit to the hospital. Patient data was anonymised by the hospital, clinical data was standardized to have a mean of zero and a unit standard deviation. This data was made public with the aim to allow researchers to develop ways to enable the hospital to rapidly predict and potentially identify SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. We find that with full blood counts random forest, shallow learning and a flexible ANN model predict SARS-CoV-2 patients with high accuracy between populations on regular wards (AUC = 94-95%) and those not admitted to hospital or in the community (AUC = 80-86%). Here, AUC is the Area Under the receiver operating characteristics Curve and a measure for model performance. Moreover, a simple linear combination of 4 blood counts can be used to have an AUC of 85% for patients within the community. The normalised data of different blood parameters from SARS-CoV-2 positive patients exhibit a decrease in platelets, leukocytes, eosinophils, basophils and lymphocytes, and an increase in monocytes. SARS-CoV-2 positive patients exhibit a characteristic immune response profile pattern and changes in different parameters measured in the full blood count that are detected from simple and rapid blood tests. While symptoms at an early stage of infection are known to overlap with other common conditions, parameters of the full blood counts can be analysed to distinguish the viral type at an earlier stage than current rt-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 allow at present. This new methodology has potential to greatly improve initial screening for patients where PCR based diagnostic tools are limited.

Indexed as

Blood Cell CountMachine LearningBetacoronavirusBrazilClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDatasets as TopicHumansMass ScreeningModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPrognosisArtificial Neural Network (ANN)Full blood countLeukocytesMachine LearningMonocytesSARS-CoV-2Screening

Identifiers

PMID32652499
PMCPMC7296324
OpenAlexW3034711653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.