ArticleEBioMedicine2020
Tumour budding, poorly differentiated clusters, and T-cell response in colorectal cancer.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and internal validation of a prognostic nomogram for cancer-specific survival among elderly unresected colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a retrospective SEER database study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma-From Incidental Observation to Prognostic Marker: Lessons Learned from Colorectal Cancer Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Characterization of Lymphocyte Subsets in Peripheral Blood of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Exploratory analysis of tumor budding density in resected synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The immune microenvironment of colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Optimizing Prognostic Assessment in High-Risk Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: The Impact of Tumor Budding and a Novel Histomorphological Scoring System.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Single-cell and spatial omics unravel the spatiotemporal biology of tumour border invasion and haematogenous metastasis.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Review
- Correlations of pathomorphological parameters between lesions at the invasive front and lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer: a retrospective clinical study.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Use of Deep Learning to Evaluate Tumor Microenvironmental Features for Prediction of Colon Cancer Recurrence.Cancer research communications · 2024Article
- High KRT17 expression in tumour budding indicates immunologically 'hot' tumour budding and predicts good survival in patients with colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational immunology · 2024Article
- Article
- Bayesian risk prediction model for colorectal cancer mortality through integration of clinicopathologic and genomic data.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
- Bone marrow adipocytes induce cancer-associated fibroblasts and immune evasion, enhancing invasion and drug resistance.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Simultaneous analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells density, tumor budding status, and presence of lymphoid follicles in CRC tissue.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Immune cell profiles in the tumor microenvironment of early-onset, intermediate-onset, and later-onset colorectal cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022Article
- Desmoplastic Reaction, Immune Cell Response, and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Coffee Intake of Colorectal Cancer Patients and Prognosis According to Histopathologic Lymphocytic Reaction and T-Cell Infiltrates.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2022Article
- Novel Criteria for Intratumoral Budding with Prognostic Relevance for Colon Cancer and Its Histological Subtypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a "zero-budding" category in colorectal cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021Article
- Association ofClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumour budding and poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) represent forms of tumour invasion. We hypothesised that T-cell densities (reflecting adaptive anti-tumour immunity) might be inversely associated with tumour budding and PDC in colorectal carcinoma.
methodsUtilising 915 colon and rectal carcinomas in two U.S.-wide prospective cohort studies, and multiplex immunofluorescence combined with machine learning algorithms, we assessed CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RO (PTPRC), and FOXP3 co-expression patterns in lymphocytes. Tumour budding and PDC at invasive fronts were quantified by digital pathology and image analysis using the International tumour Budding Consensus Conference criteria. Using covariate data of 4,420 incident colorectal cancer cases, inverse probability weighting (IPW) was integrated with multivariable logistic regression analysis that assessed the association of T-cell subset densities with tumour budding and PDC while adjusting for selection bias due to tissue availability and potential confounders, including microsatellite instability status.
findingsTumour budding counts were inversely associated with density of CD3
interpretationTumour epithelial naïve and memory cytotoxic T cell densities are inversely associated with tumour budding at invasive fronts, suggesting that cytotoxic anti-tumour immunity suppresses tumour microinvasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.