Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651904›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2020

Synthetic biology approaches to dissecting linear motor protein function: towards the design and synthesis of artificial autonomous protein walkers.

Heiner Linke, Birte Höcker, Ken'ya Furuta, Nancy R Forde, Paul M G Curmi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Synergistic regulation of nonbinary molecular switches by protonation and light.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Heiner LinkeNanoLund and Solid State Physics, Lund University, Box 118, SE 22100, Lund, Sweden.
Birte HöckerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Bayreuth, 95447, Bayreuth, Germany.
Ken'ya FurutaAdvanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-2492, Japan.
Nancy R FordeDepartment of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Paul M G CurmiSchool of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. p.curmi@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-7638
Lund University · SENational Institute of Information and Communications Technology · JPSimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Bayreuth · DEUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP170103153European Research Council Consolidator Grant 647548European Union 732482 Bio4CompGrant-in Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas "Molecular Engine" JP18H05420Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse 2016.0089Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 2020-04680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular motors and machines are essential for all cellular processes that together enable life. Built from proteins with a wide range of properties, functionalities and performance characteristics, biological motors perform complex tasks and can transduce chemical energy into mechanical work more efficiently than human-made combustion engines. Sophisticated studies of biological protein motors have provided many structural and biophysical insights and enabled the development of models for motor function. However, from the study of highly evolved, biological motors, it remains difficult to discern detailed mechanisms, for example, about the relative role of different force generation mechanisms, or how information is communicated across a protein to achieve the necessary coordination. A promising, complementary approach to answering these questions is to build synthetic protein motors from the bottom up. Indeed, much effort has been invested in functional protein design, but so far, the "holy grail" of designing and building a functional synthetic protein motor has not been realized. Here, we review the progress made to date, and we put forward a roadmap for achieving the aim of constructing the first artificial, autonomously running protein motor. Specifically, we propose to break down the task into (i) enzymatic control of track binding, (ii) the engineering of asymmetry and (iii) the engineering of allosteric control for internal communication. We also propose specific approaches for solving each of these challenges.

Indexed as

AllosteryEnergy transductionMotor proteinProcessivitySynthetic biologyThermal fluctuations

Identifiers

PMID32651904
PMCPMC7429643
OpenAlexW3041967090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.